ArticleResuscitation2007
Protein synthesis inhibition as a potential strategy for metabolic down-regulation.
Article in Resuscitation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis pilot study tested the potential of puromycin (PUR) to inhibit protein synthesis and reduce oxygen utilization in a non-hibernating, whole animal preparation.
methodsAfter anesthesia and instrumentation, male rats received a single dose of PUR or 0.9% saline (control), followed 60 min later with [(35)S] methionine/cysteine radiolabeling. Thirty minutes after isotope injection, organ biopsies were taken for quantification of de novo protein synthesis. Arterial and central venous blood gases were obtained at baseline and 60 min after injection of PUR or 0.9% saline. Temperature, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate were recorded continuously.
resultsAnimals receiving PUR demonstrated significant reductions in protein synthesis in all organ systems sampled (p<0.05). The overall reduction averaged 67.8%. Central venous oxygen saturations (S(cv)O(2)) were higher in the PUR group than the controls at 60 min (90+/-2% versus 80+/-4%, p<0.05). The oxygen extraction ratio (O(2)ER) decreased from 16.1+/-1.7% to 6.8+/-1.2% in the PUR group (p<0.05) and increased from 12.5+/-3.2% to 16.0+/-4.2% in the controls (p=0.44). There was no difference in temperature, MAP, heart rate or blood gas variables, other than S(cv)O(2), at baseline or 60 min between groups.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that PUR is capable of reducing whole body protein synthesis significantly within a relatively short duration of time. This appears to decrease whole body oxygen utilization as evidenced by an increase in S(cv)O(2) and a decrease in O(2)ER. Protein synthesis inhibition may reduce metabolic demands and should be tested for its potential to improve outcomes where oxygen demands exceed oxygen delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.