ReviewDrugs1991
Treatment of lower extremity infections in diabetics.
Review in Drugs, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infections in Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.Current infectious disease reports · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent medical advances in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, foot infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with this disorder. Three main factors are responsible for this: neuropathy, angiopathy and immunopathy. Neuropathy is probably the most important factor: minor irritations and trauma can lead to limb-threatening infections without the patient feeling the changes. Angiopathy plays only a minor role, while immunopathy has implications for antibiotic treatment, in that bactericidal agents are needed. A classification scheme that incorporates clinical and laboratory findings can direct the selection of empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with foot infections. These infections may be defined as mild, moderate and severe. In less severe cases, there are effective oral agents that can stop the progress of the infection and obviate the need for patient hospitalisation. Moderate to severe infections require hospitalisation with the use of parenteral agents. With some of the new broad spectrum drugs, single agent therapy is now possible, eliminating the need for expensive, potentially toxic combinations. Antibiotics, however, are only part of the cure. Aggressive surgical debridement followed by conscientious local wound care plays an equal role. The ultimate goal is foot salvage, and the clinical judgement of the practitioner is paramount in determining the treatment strategies needed to achieve this objective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.