Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1724644›Full record

ReviewDrugs1991

Treatment of lower extremity infections in diabetics.

W S Joseph

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Infections in Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.Current infectious disease reports · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W S JosephDepartment of Medicine, Pennsylvania College of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia.
New York College of Podiatric Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent medical advances in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, foot infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with this disorder. Three main factors are responsible for this: neuropathy, angiopathy and immunopathy. Neuropathy is probably the most important factor: minor irritations and trauma can lead to limb-threatening infections without the patient feeling the changes. Angiopathy plays only a minor role, while immunopathy has implications for antibiotic treatment, in that bactericidal agents are needed. A classification scheme that incorporates clinical and laboratory findings can direct the selection of empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with foot infections. These infections may be defined as mild, moderate and severe. In less severe cases, there are effective oral agents that can stop the progress of the infection and obviate the need for patient hospitalisation. Moderate to severe infections require hospitalisation with the use of parenteral agents. With some of the new broad spectrum drugs, single agent therapy is now possible, eliminating the need for expensive, potentially toxic combinations. Antibiotics, however, are only part of the cure. Aggressive surgical debridement followed by conscientious local wound care plays an equal role. The ultimate goal is foot salvage, and the clinical judgement of the practitioner is paramount in determining the treatment strategies needed to achieve this objective.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsDiabetic AngiopathiesDiabetic NeuropathiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFoot DiseasesHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID1724644
OpenAlexW2037004468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.