Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17244421›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007

Patient pressure for referral for headache: a qualitative study of GPs' referral behaviour.

Myfanwy Morgan, Linda Jenkins, Leone Ridsdale

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moderators uncertainty tolerance (UT) in healthcare: a systematic review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Achieving a balance between the physical and the psychological in headache.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Decision making and referral from primary care for possible lung and colorectal cancer: a qualitative study of patients' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  20. Examining the variation in GPs' referral practice: a cross-sectional study of GPs' reasons for referral.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myfanwy MorganDivision of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London. myfanwy.morgan@kcl.ac.uk
Linda Jenkins
Leone Ridsdale
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache accounts for up to a third of new specialist neurology appointments, although brain lesions are extremely rare and there is little difference in clinical severity of referred patients and those managed in primary care. This study examines influences on GPs' referral for headache in the absence of clinical indicators. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative interview study.

settingEighteen urban and suburban general practices in the South Thames area, London.

methodPurposive sample comprising GPs with varying numbers of referrals for headache over a 12-month period. Semi-structured interviews with 20 GPs were audio taped. Transcripts were analysed thematically using a framework approach.

resultsAll GPs reported observing patient anxiety and experiencing pressure for referral. Readiness to refer in response to pressure was influenced by characteristics of the consultation, including frequent attendance, communication problems and time constraints. GPs' accounts showed variations in individual's willingness or 'resistance' to refer, reflecting differences in clinical confidence in identifying risks of brain tumour, personal tolerance of uncertainty, views of patients' 'right' to referral and perceptions of the therapeutic value of referral. A further source of variation was the local availability of services, including GPs with a specialist interest and charitably-funded clinics.

conclusionReferral for headache is often the outcome of patient pressure interacting with GP characteristics, organisational factors and service availability. Reducing specialist neurological referrals requires further training and support for some GPs in the diagnosis and management of headache. To reduce clinical uncertainty, good clinical prediction rules for headache and alternative referral pathways are required.

Indexed as

Family PracticeProfessional PracticeReferral and ConsultationAnxietyAttitude of Health PersonnelHeadacheHumansLondonPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient Relationsdoctor–patient relationshipheadachepatient anxietyqualitativereferral

Identifiers

PMID17244421
PMCPMC2032697
OpenAlexW156458044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.