Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17244420›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007

Management of acute neck pain in general practice: a prospective study.

Cees Vos, Arianne Verhagen, Jan Passchier, Bart Koes

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2008
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of Initial Provider on Health Care Utilization in Patients Seeking Care for Neck Pain.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cees VosDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Netherlands. c.vos@erasmusmc.nl
Arianne Verhagen
Jan Passchier
Bart Koes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on neck pain in primary care is sparse. The role of GPs in taking care of patients with neck pain has not been described so far. This study focused on interested in the interaction between patients and GPs in their first contact on a new episode of neck pain.

aimTo describe GPs' management of acute neck pain in patients and to detail the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures undertaken by GPs and self-care by patients. DESIGN OF STUDY: A prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up.

settingGeneral practice in The Netherlands.

methodPatients consulting their GP for non-specific acute neck pain lasting no longer than 6 weeks were invited to participate. Questionnaires were collected from patients at baseline and after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Patients rated their recovery on a 7-point ordinal scale.

resultsIn total 187 patients were included. At baseline GPs prescribed medication for 42% of patients, mostly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (56%) or muscle relaxation medication (20%); 51% were referred to a physiotherapist. Seventy-four per cent of referred patients reported recovery at the end of the follow-up year, whereas 79% of non-referred patients reported recovery. Frequently-given advice by the GP was to 'wait and see' (23%), 'improve posture' and 'stay active' (22%) or to 'take a rest' (18%). Self-care by patients included different sources of heat application (79%) and exercises (57%). Complementary medicine was used in 12% of cases and 39% of patients visited their GP again during follow up. Consultation of a medical specialist and ordering of X-rays rarely occurred.

conclusionManagement by GPs included a strategy to 'wait and see' for an expected favourable natural course supported by medication, or referral to a physiotherapist.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCohort StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMuscle Relaxants, CentralNeck PainNetherlandsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional PracticeProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMuscle Relaxants, Centralconsultation and referralduty to follow-upfamily practiceneck painpractice management

Identifiers

PMID17244420
PMCPMC2032696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.