ArticleBiology direct2007
Origin of phagotrophic eukaryotes as social cheaters in microbial biofilms.
Article in Biology direct, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fingolimod Inhibits Exopolysaccharide Production and Regulates Relevant Genes to Eliminate the Biofilm ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Division of labour in a matrix, rather than phagocytosis or endosymbiosis, as a route for the origin of eukaryotic cells.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Organelle acidification: an ancient cellular leak detector.BMC biology · 2017Article
- Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Origin and evolution of the self-organizing cytoskeleton in the network of eukaryotic organelles.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
- Eukaryotic origins: How and when was the mitochondrion acquired?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
- A general framework of persistence strategies for biological systems helps explain domains of life.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Article
- Primal eukaryogenesis: on the communal nature of precellular States, ancestral to modern life.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Article
- Endocytosis and signaling: cell logistics shape the eukaryotic cell plan.Physiological reviews · 2012Review
- The falsifiability of the models for the origin of eukaryotes.Current genetics · 2011Review
- Uniting sex and eukaryote origins in an emerging oxygenic world.Biology direct · 2010Article
- The origins of phagocytosis and eukaryogenesis.Biology direct · 2009Article
- Origin of the nucleus and Ran-dependent transport to safeguard ribosome biogenesis in a chimeric cell.Biology direct · 2008Article
- The last universal common ancestor: emergence, constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner.Biology direct · 2008Review
- Origin of eukaryotic cells as a symbiosis of parasitic alpha-proteobacteria in the periplasm of two-membrane-bounded sexual pre-karyotes.Communicative & integrative biology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe origin of eukaryotic cells was one of the most dramatic evolutionary transitions in the history of life. It is generally assumed that eukaryotes evolved later then prokaryotes by the transformation or fusion of prokaryotic lineages. However, as yet there is no consensus regarding the nature of the prokaryotic group(s) ancestral to eukaryotes. Regardless of this, a hardly debatable fundamental novel characteristic of the last eukaryotic common ancestor was the ability to exploit prokaryotic biomass by the ingestion of entire cells, i.e. phagocytosis. The recent advances in our understanding of the social life of prokaryotes may help to explain the origin of this form of total exploitation. PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: Here I propose that eukaryotic cells originated in a social environment, a differentiated microbial mat or biofilm that was maintained by the cooperative action of its members. Cooperation was costly (e.g. the production of developmental signals or an extracellular matrix) but yielded benefits that increased the overall fitness of the social group. I propose that eukaryotes originated as selfish cheaters that enjoyed the benefits of social aggregation but did not contribute to it themselves. The cheaters later evolved into predators that lysed other cells and eventually became professional phagotrophs. During several cycles of social aggregation and dispersal the number of cheaters was contained by a chicken game situation, i.e. reproductive success of cheaters was high when they were in low abundance but was reduced when they were over-represented. Radical changes in cell structure, including the loss of the rigid prokaryotic cell wall and the development of endomembranes, allowed the protoeukaryotes to avoid cheater control and to exploit nutrients more efficiently. Cellular changes were buffered by both the social benefits and the protective physico-chemical milieu of the interior of biofilms. Symbiosis with the mitochondial ancestor evolved after phagotrophy as alphaproteobacterial prey developed post-ingestion defence mechanisms to circumvent digestion in the food vacuole. Mitochondrial symbiosis triggered the origin of the nucleus. Cilia evolved last and allowed eukaryotes to predate also on planktonic prey. I will discuss how this scenario may possibly fit into the contrasting phylogenetic frameworks that have been proposed. TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS: Some aspects of the hypothesis can be tested experimentally by studying the level of exploitation cheaters can reach in social microbes. It would be interesting to test whether absorption of nutrients from lysed fellow colony members can happen and if cheaters can evolve into predators that actively digest neighbouring cells. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis highlights the importance of social exploitation in cell evolution and how a social environment can buffer drastic cellular transformations that would be lethal for planktonic forms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.