Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17238356›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2006

Analyzing the effect of data quality on the accuracy of clinical decision support systems: a computer simulation approach.

Sharique Hasan, Rema Padman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. DNN based reliability evaluation for telemedicine data.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Registry Data Coordinator (RDC): a Proper Accessible Strategy for Improving Road Traffic Injury (RTI) Hospital Based Trauma Registry Systems in Developing Countries and Low Income Countries.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2018
    Article
  16. Emergency Department Clinician Perspectives on the Data Availability to Implement Clinical Decision Support Tools for Five Clinical Practice Guidelines.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Need of informatics in designing interoperable clinical registries.International journal of medical informatics · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharique HasanH. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rema Padman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) use data from a variety sources to provide guidance to physicians at the point of care. However, several studies have shown that data from these registries often can not be trusted to be accurate or complete. For instance, studies show that accuracy and completeness in medical registries may be as low as 67% and 30.7%, respectively. Consequently, since CDSS rely on this data for generating guidance, the possibility that the medical decisions facilitated by the system may result in negative patient outcomes still exists. To analyze the extent of this problem, we present a two-pronged approach using simulation, followed by regression in order to quantify the relative impact of poor data quality on overall CDSS accuracy. The results from this analysis can be beneficial to developers and hospitals who can use the results to inform the development of procedures for minimizing incorrect medical decisions facilitated by these systems.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationBreast DiseasesDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHumansMaleMammographyPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ControlRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID17238356
PMCPMC1839724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.