Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17238355›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2006

Mutual enhancement of diverse terminologies.

Nicholas R Hardiker, Anne Casey, Amy Coenen, Debra Konicek

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Literature review of SNOMED CT use.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2014
    Review
  3. Article
  4. A dynamic classification approach for nursing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2011
    Article
  5. Representation of nursing terminologies in UMLS.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2011
    Article
  6. Translation and integration of CCC nursing diagnoses into ICNP.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas R HardikerSchool of Nursing, University of Salford, UK.
Anne Casey
Amy Coenen
Debra Konicek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to map the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) nursing diagnoses to the International Classification for Nursing Practice Version 1.0 (ICNP) and to compare the resulting representations and relationships to those within SNOMED Clinical Terms (CT). Independent reviewers reached agreement on 25 (i.e. 64%) of the 39 parent-child relationships identified via the mappings between NANDA entities. Other parent-child relationships were more questionable and are in need of further discussion. This work does not seek to promote one terminology over any other. Rather, this collaborative effort has the potential to mutually enhance all three terminologies involved in the study: ICNP, SNOMED CT and NANDA. In doing so it provides an example of the type of collaborative effort that is needed to facilitate the development of tools to support interoperability at a global level.

Indexed as

Systematized Nomenclature of MedicineVocabulary, ControlledHumansInternational Council of NursesNursing DiagnosisNursing Informatics

Identifiers

PMID17238355
PMCPMC1839333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.