ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2006
Textual guidelines versus computable guidelines: a comparative study in the framework of the PRESGUID project in order to appreciate the impact of guideline format on physician compliance.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing narrative clinical guidance with computer-readable artifacts: Authoring FHIR implementation guides based on WHO recommendations.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- A generic system for critiquing physicians' prescriptions: usability, satisfaction and lessons learnt.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2011Article
- How to translate therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines into rules for critiquing physician prescriptions? Methods and application to five guidelines.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2010Article
- Use of the C4.5 machine learning algorithm to test a clinical guideline-based decision support system.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2008Article
- Commentary: Modernizing Guidelines Development to Speed the Transfer of Science to Patient Care.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
- An Integrated Process for Co-Developing and Implementing Written and Computable Clinical Practice Guidelines.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
- An Evaluation Framework for a Novel Process to Codevelop Written and Computable Guidelines.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
- Adapted Kaizen: Multi-Organizational Complex Process Redesign for Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe compliance of physicians with the clinical practice guidelines (CPG) is insufficient and needs to be improved.
objectiveTo determine whether standalone computerized CPG within the PRESGUID project could improve compliance with the recommendations than the use of CPG in textual format.
methodComparative analyses of the responses made by two groups of resident physicians to a set of clinical cases. One group of residents had access to the CPG exclusively in textual format (paper document) while the second group had access to the CPG exclusively in computerized format within the PRESGUID software applications.
resultsThe computable CPG are more efficient than the paper-based CPG regarding responses in compliance with the recommendations especially those judged to be relevant by an expert.
conclusionThese results should encourage the bodies responsible for diffusing CPG to promote the computable format and to facilitate the computerization process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17238335PMC1839673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.