ArticleThe Journal of physiology2007
Orthodromic spike generation from electrical stimuli in the rat carotid body: implications for the afferent spike generation process.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- β-Adrenoceptor blockade prevents carotid body hyperactivity and elevated vascular sympathetic nerve density induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Moderate inhibition of mitochondrial function augments carotid body hypoxic sensitivity.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Gain-of-function Nav1.8 mutations in painful neuropathy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Peripheral chemoreceptors: function and plasticity of the carotid body.Comprehensive Physiology · 2012Review
- Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors do not mediate excitatory transmission in young rat carotid body.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Carotid body chemoreceptors respond to a decrease in arterial partial pressure of O(2) with an increase in sinus nerve action potential (AP) activity which initiates a number of protective reflexes. The spike generation process is unresolved but is generally considered to be caused by a synaptic depolarizing potential (SDP) in the nerve endings caused by release of an excitatory transmitter from the glomus cell, which is a secretory cell that is presynaptic to the nerve terminals. To detect the purported SDPs, stimulating electrodes were placed at sites within the carotid body from which orthodromic APs could be evoked at low threshold currents. The probability of AP generation as a function of stimulus current was fitted well to a Boltzmann distribution. Subthreshold electrical stimuli which were expected to summate with subthreshold SDPs, failed, in all instances, to evoke APs at the expected probability. When the stimulus was gated to the occurrence of a spontaneous AP, no change in electrical threshold was observed as the delay between the spontaneous AP and electrical stimulus was increased, despite the presumed disappearance of an SDP in the post-AP period. Decreases in spontaneous AP generation rate, caused by hyperoxia, were associated with only slight changes in the mean orthodromic stimulus threshold, but with a significant increase in slope of the Boltzmann function, suggesting a decrease in the variance of nerve terminal excitability during hyperoxia. These results suggest that AP generation is not due to SDP events; rather, AP generation is likely to be due to a process endogenous to the nerve terminals that modulates the variability of nerve terminal excitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.