Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17233920›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Comparative genomics reveals a constant rate of origination and convergent acquisition of functional retrogenes in Drosophila.

Yongsheng Bai, Claudio Casola, Cédric Feschotte, Esther Betrán

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. microPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modular Evolution of the Drosophila Metabolome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Intronic gRNAs for the Construction of Minimal Gene Drive Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yongsheng BaiDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA. yxb4544@betranlab.uta.edu
Claudio Casola
Cédric Feschotte
Esther Betrán
The University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

Sexual conflict and relocation of genes by duplicationR01GM071813 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI BETRAN, ESTHER · 2005 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 071813-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcessed copies of genes (retrogenes) are duplicate genes that originated through the reverse-transcription of a host transcript and insertion in the genome. This type of gene duplication, as any other, could be a source of new genes and functions. Using whole genome sequence data for 12 Drosophila species, we dated the origin of 94 retroposition events that gave rise to candidate functional genes in D. melanogaster.

resultsBased on this analysis, we infer that functional retrogenes have emerged at a fairly constant rate of 0.5 genes per million years per lineage over the last approximately 63 million years of Drosophila evolution. The number of functional retrogenes and the rate at which they are recruited in the D. melanogaster lineage are of the same order of magnitude as those estimated in the human lineage, despite the higher deletion bias in the Drosophila genome. However, unlike primates, the rate of retroposition in Drosophila seems to be fairly constant and no burst of retroposition can be inferred from our analyses. In addition, our data also support an important role for retrogenes as a source of lineage-specific male functions, in agreement with previous hypotheses. Finally, we identified three cases of functional retrogenes in D. melanogaster that have been independently retroposed and recruited in parallel as new genes in other Drosophila lineages.

conclusionTogether, these results indicate that retroposition is a persistent mechanism and a recurrent pathway for the emergence of new genes in Drosophila.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsAnimalsChimerismDrosophila melanogasterGenes, InsectMalePhylogenyRetroelementsSequence Analysis, DNATestisRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID17233920
PMCPMC1839131
OpenAlexW2120362978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.