ArticleCritical care (London, England)2007
Intracranial pressure monitoring in intensive care: clinical advantages of a computerized system over manual recording.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459806 (Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure Time Dose by the New Integra CereLink ICP Monitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure Time Dose by the New Integra CereLink ICP Monitor
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Routine intracranial pressure monitoring in acute coma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Chest physiotherapy on intracranial pressure of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaPooled it
- Co-Designed Digital Device for Tracking Rehabilitation Dosage in a Clinical Environment After Stroke: Mixed Methods Validity and Feasibility Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Manual Intracranial Pressure Recording Compared to a Computerized High-Resolution System: A CENTER-TBI Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Comparison of Two Intracranial Pressure Calculation Methods and Their Effects on the Mean Intracranial Pressure and Intracranial Pressure Dose.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Multivariate projection method to investigate inflammation associated with secondary insults and outcome after human traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2016Observational
- Data collection and interpretation.Neurocritical care · 2015Review
- Changes of the GPR17 receptor, a new target for neurorepair, in neurons and glial cells in patients with traumatic brain injury.Purinergic signalling · 2013Article
- Predictive data mining on monitoring data from the intensive care unit.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2013Article
- Patterns of increased intracranial pressure after severe traumatic brain injury.Neurocritical care · 2009Article
- Not if but when; no longer why but how.Critical care (London, England) · 2007Article
- Bedside Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter As a Means of Detecting Raised Intracranial Pressure in Neuro-Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe presence of intracranial hypertension (HICP) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects patient outcome. Intracranial pressure (ICP) data from electronic monitoring equipment are usually calculated and recorded hourly in the clinical chart by trained nurses. Little is known, however, about how precisely this method reflects the real patterns of ICP after severe TBI. In this study, we compared hourly manual recording with a validated and continuous computerized reference standard.
methodsThirty randomly selected patients with severe TBI and HICP admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (Policlinico University Hospital, Milan, Italy) were retrospectively studied. A 24-hour interval with ICP monitoring was randomly selected for each patient. The manually recorded data available for analysis covered 672 hours corresponding to 36,492 digital data points. The two methods were evaluated using the correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method. We used the proportion test to analyze differences in the number of episodes of HICP (ICP > 20 mm Hg) detected with the two methods and the paired t test to analyze differences in the percentage of time of HICP.
resultsThere was good agreement between the digitally collected ICP and the manual recordings of the end-hour values. Bland and Altman analysis confirmed a mean difference between the two methods of 0.05 mm Hg (standard deviation 3.66); 96% of data were within the limits of agreement (+7.37 and -7.28). The average percentages of time of ICP greater than 20 mm Hg were 39% calculated from the digital measurements and 34% from the manual observations. From the continuous digital recording, we identified 351 episodes of ICP greater than 20 mm Hg lasting at least five minutes and 287 similar episodes lasting at least ten minutes. Conversely, end-hour ICP of greater than 20 mm Hg was observed in only 204 cases using manual recording methods.
conclusionAlthough manually recorded end-hour ICP accurately reflected the computerized end-hour and mean hour values, the important omission of a number of episodes of high ICP, some of long duration, results in a clinical picture that is not accurate or informative of the true pattern of unstable ICP in patients with TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.