Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17233895›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2007

Intracranial pressure monitoring in intensive care: clinical advantages of a computerized system over manual recording.

Elisa Roncati Zanier, Fabrizio Ortolano, Laura Ghisoni, Angelo Colombo, Sabina Losappio, Nino Stocchetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459806 (Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure Time Dose by the New Integra CereLink ICP Monitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04459806 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure Time Dose by the New Integra CereLink ICP Monitor

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled250ConditionsIntracranial Hypertension, Traumatic Brain Injury, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Intracranial HemorrhagesArmsintracranial pressure monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Routine intracranial pressure monitoring in acute coma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Data collection and interpretation.Neurocritical care · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Predictive data mining on monitoring data from the intensive care unit.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Not if but when; no longer why but how.Critical care (London, England) · 2007
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa Roncati ZanierNeurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Milan University, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli, e Regina Elena, Fondazione IRCCS, Milano, Italy. ezanier@policlinico.mi.it
Fabrizio Ortolano
Laura Ghisoni
Angelo Colombo
Sabina Losappio
Nino Stocchetti
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe presence of intracranial hypertension (HICP) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects patient outcome. Intracranial pressure (ICP) data from electronic monitoring equipment are usually calculated and recorded hourly in the clinical chart by trained nurses. Little is known, however, about how precisely this method reflects the real patterns of ICP after severe TBI. In this study, we compared hourly manual recording with a validated and continuous computerized reference standard.

methodsThirty randomly selected patients with severe TBI and HICP admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (Policlinico University Hospital, Milan, Italy) were retrospectively studied. A 24-hour interval with ICP monitoring was randomly selected for each patient. The manually recorded data available for analysis covered 672 hours corresponding to 36,492 digital data points. The two methods were evaluated using the correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method. We used the proportion test to analyze differences in the number of episodes of HICP (ICP > 20 mm Hg) detected with the two methods and the paired t test to analyze differences in the percentage of time of HICP.

resultsThere was good agreement between the digitally collected ICP and the manual recordings of the end-hour values. Bland and Altman analysis confirmed a mean difference between the two methods of 0.05 mm Hg (standard deviation 3.66); 96% of data were within the limits of agreement (+7.37 and -7.28). The average percentages of time of ICP greater than 20 mm Hg were 39% calculated from the digital measurements and 34% from the manual observations. From the continuous digital recording, we identified 351 episodes of ICP greater than 20 mm Hg lasting at least five minutes and 287 similar episodes lasting at least ten minutes. Conversely, end-hour ICP of greater than 20 mm Hg was observed in only 204 cases using manual recording methods.

conclusionAlthough manually recorded end-hour ICP accurately reflected the computerized end-hour and mean hour values, the important omission of a number of episodes of high ICP, some of long duration, results in a clinical picture that is not accurate or informative of the true pattern of unstable ICP in patients with TBI.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedAdolescentAdultBrain InjuriesComputersCritical CareFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntracranial HypertensionMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNursing RecordsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID17233895
PMCPMC2151894
OpenAlexW1590425590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.