Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17233548›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2007

Elderly medical patients treated with prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin: influence of renal function on anti-Xa activity level.

Isabelle Mahe, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Ludovic Drouet, Guy Simoneau, Heidi Di Castillo, Virginie Siguret, Jean-François Bergmann, Eric Pautas

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Thrombosis prophylaxis in geriatric patients].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Enoxaparin dosing in the elderly using adjusted body weight.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2009
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle MaheInternal Medicine Department A, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France. isabelle.mahe@lrb.aphp.fr
Isabelle Gouin-Thibault
Ludovic Drouet
Guy Simoneau
Heidi Di Castillo
Virginie Siguret
Jean-François Bergmann
Eric Pautas
Hôpital Lariboisière · FRHôpital Charles-Foix · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety and optimal use of prophylactic treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins in elderly patients with impaired renal function remain undefined.

methodsThe primary aim of this study was to analyse, in 'real life', the influence of renal function, as assessed by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), on the level of anti-Xa activity in medical hospitalised elderly patients receiving prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin. Consecutive hospitalised acutely ill medical patients aged >or=75 years receiving daily dosages of enoxaparin 4000 IU for up to 10 days were prospectively enrolled in two centres. Peak anti-Xa activity was measured at the beginning and during the course of therapy.

resultsOne hundred and twenty-five patients (31 men, 94 women), mean age 87.5 +/- 6.3 years, mean bodyweight 56.4 +/- 11.9 kg and mean CL(CR) 39.8 +/- 16.1 mL/min, were enrolled in the study. The mean maximum anti-Xa activity (day 1 to day 10) [anti-Xa(max1-10)] was 0.64 +/- 0.23 IU/mL (range 0.24-1.50 IU/mL). Weak negative correlations were found between CL(CR) and anti-Xa(max) and between bodyweight and anti-Xa(max). Mean anti-Xa(max) was slightly but significantly higher in patients with CL(CR) of 20-30 mL/min compared with patients with CL(CR) of 31-40, 41-50 or 51-80 mL/min (0.72 versus 0.61, 0.61 and 0.60 IU/mL, respectively), and in patients weighing <50 kg compared with patients weighing 50-60 kg or >60 kg (0.74 vs 0.64 and 0.52 IU/mL, respectively). Serious bleeding occurred in five patients, but anti-Xa(max) values in these patients were not different to those in patients without bleeding (p = 0.77). Individual anti-Xa(max) at the beginning or during the course of treatment was measured in the subgroup of 58 patients in whom anti-Xa activity was measured at least once during the study. The mean anti-Xa(max) value was slightly but significantly higher during the course of the therapy than at the beginning of the study (0.63 +/- 0.26 IU/mL vs 0.56 +/- 0.23 IU/mL, p = 0.012).

conclusionOnly CL(CR) <30 mL/min and bodyweight <50 kg were associated with significantly higher anti-Xa(max) values. The clinical relevance of these increases remains questionable. No conclusions about the safety of enoxaparin in elderly medical patients can be drawn from these findings.

Indexed as

Factor Xa InhibitorsAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnticoagulantsBody WeightCreatinineEnoxaparinFactor XaFemaleHumansKidney Function TestsMaleRenal InsufficiencyThromboembolismAnticoagulantsCreatinineEnoxaparinFactor XaFactor Xa Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID17233548
OpenAlexW115752518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.