Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17229805›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2007

Recurrence of choroidal neovascularisation after photodynamic therapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Michael J Potter, Shelagh M Szabo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Photodynamic therapy in the anti-VEGF era.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J PotterDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. mpotter@eyecarecentre.org
Shelagh M Szabo
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the incidence of recurrence of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) 18 months after cessation of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin monotherapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

methodsThis was a prospective interventional cohort study. The sample consisted of 108 individuals with CNV secondary to AMD which was treated with PDT. Data on demographics, pre-PDT and post-PDT Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) acuity, pre-PDT lesion size and composition were collected for each participant. All participants returned for fundus photographs and ETDRS acuity measurements 18 months after their final PDT, which were compared with the same measurements from the final treatment session to determine recurrence status. Recurrences were classified primarily on the basis of haemorrhage and increased lesion size.

resultsRecurrences were observed in 36 of 108 (33%) eyes. 23 of 36 (64%) recurrences were clinically meaningful. Of the explanatory variables considered, only final PDT acuity was significantly different between those that recurred (45.5 ETDRS letters) and those that did not (38.4 letters; p = 0.03).

conclusionCNV recurrences are common after PDT for AMD, occurring in 33% of eyes in this study. Visual acuity measured at the final PDT treatment visit may be a predictor of subsequent recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChoroidal NeovascularizationFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsProspective StudiesRecurrenceRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeVerteporfinPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsVerteporfin

Identifiers

PMID17229805
PMCPMC1955583
OpenAlexW1968946486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.