Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17229693›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2007

A replication-competent adenovirus-human immunodeficiency virus (Ad-HIV) tat and Ad-HIV env priming/Tat and envelope protein boosting regimen elicits enhanced protective efficacy against simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P challenge in rhesus macaques.

Thorsten Demberg, Ruth H Florese, Megan J Heath, Kay Larsen, Irene Kalisz, V S Kalyanaraman, Eun Mi Lee, Ranajit Pal, David Venzon, Richard Grant and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Future Prospects for the Development of Cost-Effective Adenovirus Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thorsten DembergVaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute/NIH, 41 Medlars Drive, Building 41, Bethesda, MD 20892-5065, USA.
Ruth H Florese
Megan J Heath
Kay Larsen
Irene Kalisz
V S Kalyanaraman
Eun Mi Lee
Ranajit Pal
David Venzon
Richard Grant
L Jean Patterson
Birgit Korioth-Schmitz
Adam Buzby
Dilani Dombagoda
David C Montefiori
Norman L Letvin
Aurelio Cafaro
Barbara Ensoli
Marjorie Robert-Guroff
National Cancer Institute · USBioScience Laboratories (United States) · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

HUMORAL AND CELLULAR IMMUNE RESPONSES TO HUMAN AND NONHUMAN PRIMATE RETROVIRUSESZ01BC005536 · NCI · BASIC SCIENCES · PI ROBERT-GUROFF, MARJORIE · 1996 to 2007
$4.1M
BIOSTATISTICS AND DATA MANAGEMENT SECTIONZ01SC007202 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI STEINBERG, SETH M · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHSNIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015431NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI 15431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that replication-competent adenovirus (Ad)-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recombinant prime/protein boost regimens elicit potent immunogenicity and strong, durable protection of rhesus macaques against SIV(mac251). Additionally, native Tat vaccines have conferred strong protection against simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV(89.6P) challenge of cynomolgus monkeys, while native, inactivated, or vectored Tat vaccines have failed to elicit similar protective efficacy in rhesus macaques. Here we asked if priming rhesus macaques with replicating Ad-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tat and boosting with the Tat protein would elicit protection against SHIV(89.6P). We also evaluated a Tat/Env regimen, adding an Ad-HIV env recombinant and envelope protein boost to test whether envelope antibodies would augment acute-phase protection. Further, expecting cellular immunity to enhance chronic viremia control, we tested a multigenic group: Ad-HIV tat, -HIV env, -SIV gag, and -SIV nef recombinants and Tat, Env, and Nef proteins. All regimens were immunogenic. A hierarchy was observed in enzyme-linked immunospot responses (with the strongest response for Env, followed by Gag, followed by Nef, followed by Tat) and antibody titers (with the highest titer for Env, followed by Tat, followed by Nef, followed by Gag). Following intravenous SHIV(89.6P) challenge, all macaques became infected. Compared to controls, no protection was seen in the Tat-only group, confirming previous reports for rhesus macaques. However, the multigenic group blunted acute viremia by approximately 1 log (P = 0.017), and both the multigenic and Tat/Env groups reduced chronic viremia by 3 and 4 logs, respectively, compared to controls (multigenic, P = 0.0003; Tat/Env, P < 0.0001). The strikingly greater reduction in the Tat/Env group than in the multigenic group (P = 0.014) was correlated with Tat and Env binding antibodies. Since prechallenge anti-Env antibodies lacked SHIV(89.6P)-neutralizing activity, other functional anti-Env and anti-Tat activities are under investigation, as is a possible synergy between the Tat and Env immunogens.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAdenoviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, ViralGene Products, envGene Products, tatHIVImmunologic MemoryLymphocytesMacaca mulattaSimian Immunodeficiency Virustat Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusAntibodies, ViralGene Products, envGene Products, tattat Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Identifiers

PMID17229693
PMCPMC1866031
OpenAlexW2121946485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.