ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2007
Ascertainment bias and the pattern of nucleotide diversity at the human ALDH2 locus in a Japanese population.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many East Asian human populations harbor a high-frequency deficiency allele for the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) enzyme, a critical protein involved in the metabolism of ethanol. Here we use resequencing and long-range SNP haplotype data from a Japanese sample to test whether patterns of nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium at this locus are compatible with a standard neutral model of evolution. Examination of the pattern of polymorphism at a locus such as this, where the frequency of a common allele is known a priori, introduces an ascertainment bias that must be corrected for in analyses of the frequency spectrum of polymorphisms. We apply a flexible and generally applicable simulation approach to correct for this bias in our ALDH2 data and, also, to explore the effect of bias on the commonly used summary statistics Tajima's D, Fu and Li's D, and Fay and Wu's H. Our study finds no evidence that the pattern of genetic variation at ALDH2 differs from that expected under a standard neutral model. However, our general examination of ascertainment bias indicates that a priori knowledge of segregating alleles greatly affects the expected distributions of summary statistics. Under many parameter combinations we find that ascertainment bias introduces an elevated rate of false positives when summary statistics are used to test for deviations from a standard neutral model. However, we also show that over a wide range of conditions the power of all summary statistics can be greatly increased by incorporating prior knowledge of segregating alleles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17225965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.