Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17225416›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2006

Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Colleen G Le Prell, Kohei Kawamoto, Yehoash Raphael, David F Dolan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects of Calcitonin-Gene-Related-Peptide on Auditory Nerve Activity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen G Le PrellKresge Hearing Research Institute, 1301 East Ann Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0506, USA. colleeng@umich.edu
Kohei Kawamoto
Yehoash Raphael
David F Dolan
Kansai Medical University · JP

Funding

Scientific Synergy CoreP30DC005188 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLAN, DAVID FRANCIS · 2002 to 2016
$10.3M
PERCEPTUAL CONSEQUENCES OF COCHLEAR &STIMULUS MANIPULATIONSP01DC000078 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOODY, DAVID · 1988 to 2002
$4.1M
AUDITORY SYSTEM EXCITOXIC TRAUMA--EFFERENT PROTECTIONF32DC000367 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LE PRELL, COLLEEN G · 1998 to 2000
$38k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000367NIDCD NIH HHS F32-DC00367NIDCD NIH HHS P01 DC000078NIDCD NIH HHS P01-DC00078NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005188NIDCD NIH HHS P30-DC05188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When sinusoidal electric stimulation is applied to the intact cochlea, a frequency-specific acoustic emission can be recorded in the ear canal. Acoustic emissions are produced by basilar membrane motion, and have been used to suggest a corresponding acoustic sensation termed "electromotile hearing." Electromotile hearing has been specifically attributed to electric stimulation of outer hair cells in the intact organ of Corti. To determine the nature of the auditory perception produced by electric stimulation of a cochlea with intact outer hair cells, guinea pigs were tested in a psychophysical task. First, subjects were trained to report detection of sinusoidal acoustic stimuli and dynamic range was assessed using response latency. Subjects were then implanted with a ball electrode placed into scala tympani. Following the surgical implant procedure, subjects were transferred to a task in which acoustic signals were replaced by sinusoidal electric stimulation, and dynamic range was assessed again. Finally, the ability of acoustic pure-tone stimuli to mask the detection of the electric signals was assessed. Based on the masking effects, it is concluded that sinusoidal electric stimulation of the intact cochlea results in perception of a tonal (rather than a broadband or noisy) sound at a frequency of 8 kHz or above.

Indexed as

Radio WavesAcousticsAnimalsCochleaElectric StimulationGuinea PigsHearingOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPerceptual MaskingPsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID17225416
PMCPMC3132799
OpenAlexW2071598768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.