Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17224063›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Prediction of effective genome size in metagenomic samples.

Jeroen Raes, Jan O Korbel, Martin J Lercher, Christian von Mering, Peer Bork

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of vitamin BApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Towards AI-designed genomes using a variational autoencoder.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Identification of novel broad host-range promoter sequences functional in diverse Pseudomonadota by a promoter-trap approach.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Lineage-specific evolution ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of metagenomic workflows using a newly constructed human gut microbiome mock community.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeroen RaesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany. raes@embl.de
Jan O Korbel
Martin J Lercher
Christian von Mering
Peer Bork

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a novel computational approach to predict effective genome size (EGS; a measure that includes multiple plasmid copies, inserted sequences, and associated phages and viruses) from short sequencing reads of environmental genomics (or metagenomics) projects. We observe considerable EGS differences between environments and link this with ecologic complexity as well as species composition (for instance, the presence of eukaryotes). For example, we estimate EGS in a complex, organism-dense farm soil sample at about 6.3 megabases (Mb) whereas that of the bacteria therein is only 4.7 Mb; for bacteria in a nutrient-poor, organism-sparse ocean surface water sample, EGS is as low as 1.6 Mb. The method also permits evaluation of completion status and assembly bias in single-genome sequencing projects.

Indexed as

EnvironmentArtifactsGenetic MarkersGenome, BacterialGenomicsModels, GeneticProkaryotic CellsReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID17224063
PMCPMC1839125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.