Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17222358›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2007

Comparison of smallpox outbreak control strategies using a spatial metapopulation model.

I M Hall, J R Egan, I Barrass, R Gani, S Leach

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The spatial resolution of epidemic peaks.PLoS computational biology · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Networks and the epidemiology of infectious disease.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2011
    Article
  9. Modelling emerging viral epidemics for public health protection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Individual identity and movement networks for disease metapopulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Accuracy of models for the 2001 foot-and-mouth epidemic.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I M HallMicrobial Risk Assessment, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Porton Down, Wiltshire, UK.
J R Egan
I Barrass
R Gani
S Leach

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the potential benefits of regionally targeted mass vaccination as an adjunct to other smallpox control strategies we employed a spatial metapopulation patch model based on the administrative districts of Great Britain. We counted deaths due to smallpox and to vaccination to identify strategies that minimized total deaths. Results confirm that case isolation, and the tracing, vaccination and observation of case contacts can be optimal for control but only for optimistic assumptions concerning, for example, the basic reproduction number for smallpox (R0=3) and smaller numbers of index cases ( approximately 10). For a wider range of scenarios, including larger numbers of index cases and higher reproduction numbers, the addition of mass vaccination targeted only to infected districts provided an appreciable benefit (5-80% fewer deaths depending on where the outbreak started with a trigger value of 1-10 isolated symptomatic individuals within a district).

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInfection ControlMass VaccinationHumansModels, BiologicalSmallpoxSmallpox VaccineUnited KingdomSmallpox Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID17222358
PMCPMC2870673
OpenAlexW2001997836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.