Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17219091›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2007

Developing Test Guidelines on invertebrate development and reproduction for the assessment of chemicals, including potential endocrine active substances- the OECD perspective.

Anne Gourmelon, Jukka Ahtiainen, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up-scaling research to address ecological consequences.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne GourmelonOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2 rue André-Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. anne.gourmelon@oecd.org
Jukka Ahtiainen
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Test Guidelines Programme is involved in the international harmonization and validation of test methods to evaluate effects of chemicals, including potential endocrine active substances. To meet their existing and foreseen regulatory needs in this area, OECD member countries have encouraged the development of test methods and their emergence at the OECD level. Validation activities are underway in countries and industry to ascertain the relevance and reliability of these tests to enable future regulatory acceptance. This includes work on development and (sexual) reproduction of aquatic invertebrates. What is the importance of mechanistic information in regulating chemicals, and how to address the issue of possible endocrine disruption in invertebrates while integrating these tests in a regulatory scheme are the current questions faced by the OECD countries.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicInternational AgenciesAnimalsEndocrine DisruptorsInternational CooperationInvertebratesReproductionToxicity TestsEndocrine Disruptors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.