Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17219087›Full record

ReviewEcotoxicology (London, England)2007

Endocrine disruption in prosobranch molluscs: evidence and ecological relevance.

Jörg Oehlmann, Patrizia Di Benedetto, Michaela Tillmann, Martina Duft, Matthias Oetken, Ulrike Schulte-Oehlmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping molluscan endocrinology: a systematic and critical appraisal.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intoxication and biochemical responses of freshwater snail Bellamya aeruginosa to ethylbenzene.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anthropogenic pollutants: a threat to ecosystem sustainability?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jörg OehlmannDepartment of Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Siesmayerstrasse 70, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany. oehlmann@bio.uni-frankfurt.de
Patrizia Di Benedetto
Michaela Tillmann
Martina Duft
Matthias Oetken
Ulrike Schulte-Oehlmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosobranch snails represent almost 50% of all recent molluscs, are ubiquitously distributed, play important roles in various ecosystems and exhibit a variety of reproductive modes and life-cycle-strategies. Many of them attain life spans of several years, which in combination with their limited ability to metabolize organic chemicals, may contribute to the fact that prosobranchs constitute one of the most endangered taxonomic groups in aquatic ecosystems. Although it is not yet known to what extent endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) contribute to this situation, the case of tributyltin (TBT) and its population-level impact on prosobranchs demonstrates the general susceptibility of these invertebrates. The existing evidence for comparable population-level effects in prosobranch snails by other androgens, antiandrogens, and estrogens is critically reviewed. The example of TBT demonstrates the difficulty to prove an endocrine mode of action for a given chemical. Although it is generally accepted that TBT causes imposex and intersex in prosobranch snails as a result of endocrine disruption, the detailed biochemical mechanism is still a matter of debate. The strengths and weaknesses of the five competing hypotheses are discussed, together with previously unpublished data. Finally, the ecological relevance of EDC effects on the population and community level and the application of prosobranchs for the assessment of EDCs are addressed.

Indexed as

AnimalsEcosystemEndocrine DisruptorsMolluscaPopulation DynamicsReproductionWater Pollutants, ChemicalEndocrine DisruptorsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.