ArticleExperimental brain research1991
A study of branching in the projection from the inferior olive to the x and lateral c1 zones of the cat cerebellum using a combined electrophysiological and retrograde fluorescent double-labelling technique.
Article in Experimental brain research, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The distribution of climbing and mossy fiber collateral branches from the copula pyramidis and the paramedian lobule: congruence of climbing fiber cortical zones and the pattern of zebrin banding within the rat cerebellum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2003Article
- Structure-function relations of two somatotopically corresponding regions of the rat cerebellar cortex: olivo-cortico-nuclear connections.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2002Article
- Pontine and lateral reticular projections to the c1 zone in lobulus simplex and paramedian lobule of the rat cerebellar cortex.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2002Article
- Step phase-related excitability changes in spino-olivocerebellar paths to the c1 and c3 zones in cat cerebellum.The Journal of physiology · 1995Article
- Lateral and medial sub-divisions within the olivocerebellar zones of the paravermal cortex in lobule Vb/c of the cat anterior lobe.Experimental brain research · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pattern of transverse branching in the olivocerebellar projection to the x zone in the vermis and the lateral c1 zone in the paravermis of the cat anterior lobe was studied using a combined electrophysiological and retrograde double-labelling tracer technique. Fluorochrome-tagged latex microspheres were well suited for this purpose. The results show that the region of olive that supplies climbing fibres to the two zones forms a continuous, rostrocaudally directed column about 2.25 mm in length, in a caudo-lateral to rostromedial part of the medial accessory olive (MAO), on average between A-P levels 12.50-10.50. This column may be divided into caudal and rostral halves that project respectively to the x and lateral c1 zones in the apical folia of lobules V/VIa. Partial overlap between these two territories occurs in an intermediate region (A-P levels 12.00-11.00) in middle MAO where olive cells that supply climbing fibres to either x or lateral c1 are intermingled with a smaller population of cells whose axons branch to provide climbing fibres to both zones. Quantitative analysis showed that, when different tracers were injected into each zone in the same animal, double-labeled cells represented only 5-7% of either single-labelled cell population within this area of overlap. It is concluded that, although some transverse branching is present within the olivocerebellar projection to the x and lateral c1 zones in the apical folia of lobule V, such branching is not extensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1721877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.