ArticleContemporary clinical trials2007
Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prerandomization withdrawals from a Type 2 diabetes self-care support intervention trial are associated with lack of available support person coparticipant.Chronic illness · 2025Trial
- Costing a population health management approach for participant recruitment to a diabetes prevention study.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Trial
- A dance intervention for cancer survivors and their partners (RHYTHM).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Study partners: essential collaborators in discovering treatments for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2018Article
- Four Methods of Recruiting Couples Into a Longitudinal Study of Physical Activity in People With Osteoarthritis: Recruitment, Retention, and Lessons Learned.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Effectiveness and cost of recruiting healthy volunteers for clinical research studies using an electronic patient portal: A randomized study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- Social media and internet driven study recruitment: evaluating a new model for promoting collaborator engagement and participation.PloS one · 2015Article
- Mother-Daughter Dyad Recruitment and Cancer Intervention Challenges in an African American Sample.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2014Article
- Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.Journal of oncology practice · 2012Article
- Developing partnerships and recruiting dyads for a prostate cancer informed decision making program: lessons learned from a community-academic-clinical team.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012Article
- Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2012Article
- Increasing Asian American women's research participation: the Asian grocery store-based cancer education program.Contemporary clinical trials · 2010Article
- Understanding recruitment and retention in neurological research.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple barriers contribute to the slow recruitment of participants to research studies, which in turn extends the time required to translate promising scientific discoveries into proven therapeutic interventions. A small but growing literature is developing on the extraordinary costs of recruiting participants to studies, and thereby demonstrating that underestimating the cost of participant recruitment can contribute to these recruitment problems. These recruitment challenges and costs are exacerbated when the participants' study eligibility is determined by relatively narrowly defined illness parameters. Recruitment challenges are further compounded when dyads (two individuals engaged in a sociologically significant relationship, such as husbands and wives, siblings or extended families) must be recruited to an illness-focused study. For these latter groups, there are no data to guide researchers in how to anticipate those participant recruitment costs. This paper describes the staff costs for a variety of strategies used to recruit participants to a randomized supportive care study for couples who were within 18 months of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Pegged to the value of the U.S. dollar for the period, the average cost of staff time was $288 per recruited and enrolled dyad, plus a promised additional $100 incentive for study retention. Within the strategies used, the staff costs per recruited dyad ranged from $152 to $1688. Accrual per strategy ranged from 0 to 107 enrolled couples. When asked for secondary sources of information about the study, many participants reported more than one source of study referral, reflective of the multifaceted recruitment strategies deployed. In spite of innovative, culturally competent, and broad based recruitment methods, attainment of a diverse sample was difficult to accomplish in this study. Having estimates of the actual cost of recruiting dyads to research studies can help investigators prepare realistic study budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.