Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17218126›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2006

Cell cycle regulation in the developing lens.

Anne E Griep

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Znhit1 Regulates p21Cip1 to Control Mouse Lens Differentiation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Identification of Novel Gata3 Distal Enhancers Active in Mouse Embryonic Lens.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anne E GriepDepartment of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53706, USA. aegriep@wisc.edu

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Regulation of Ocular Lens Development by PDZ ProteinsR01EY009091 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GRIEP, ANNE E · 1992 to 2011
$5.3M
Functional Analysis of the HPV-16 E6 and E7 OncogenesR01CA098428 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LAMBERT, PAUL F. · 2003 to 2012
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA14520NCI NIH HHS CA98428NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098428NEI NIH HHS EY09091NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of cell proliferation is a critical aspect of the development of multicellular organisms. The ocular lens is an excellent model system in which to unravel the mechanisms controlling cell proliferation during development. In recent years, several cell cycle regulators have been shown to be essential for maintaining normal patterns of lens cell proliferation. Additionally, many growth factor signaling pathways and cell adhesion factors have been shown to have the capacity to regulate lens cell proliferation. Given this complexity, understanding the cross talk between these many signaling pathways and how they are coordinated are important directions for the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleHumansLens, CrystallineSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID17218126
PMCPMC2570782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.