Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17217855›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2007

Guillain-barré syndrome.

Satoshi Kuwabara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Association of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 in cerebrospinal fluid with clinical severity in a cohort of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Commentary.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2013
    Article
  11. Neurologic symptoms associated with cattle farming in the agricultural health study.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi KuwabaraDepartment of Neurology, Chiba University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan. kuwabara-s@faculty.chiba-u.jp
Chiba University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is currently divided into the two major subtypes: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). This review highlights relevant recent publications, particularly on the pathophysiology of AMAN. Molecular mimicry of the bacterial lipo-oligosaccharide by the human gangliosides is now considered an important cause of AMAN. Gangliosides GM1, GM1b, GD1a, and GalNAc-GD1a expressed on the motor axolemma are likely to be the epitopes for antibodies in AMAN. At the nodes or paranodes, deposition of antiganglioside antibodies initially cause reversible conduction block followed by axonal degeneration. Electrodiagnostic findings support this process. Disruption of glycolipids, which are important to maintain ion channel clustering at the nodes and paranode, may impair nerve conduction. Genetic polymorphisms of Campylobacter jejuni determine the expression of the gangliosides on the bacterial wall. In contrast, target molecules in AIDP have not yet been identified. Meta-analyses show efficacy of plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin therapy, but not corticosteroids, in hastening recovery.

Indexed as

Guillain-Barre SyndromeHumans

Identifiers

PMID17217855
OpenAlexW2024708579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.