ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2007
Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2009Pooled it
- The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Review
- A Familial Case Report of a 13;22 Chromosomal Translocation with Recurrent Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Failure.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2018Article
- Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening?The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2014Review
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization.Current genomics · 2012Article
- Implications of aneuploidy for stem cell biology and brain therapeutics.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2012Article
- Derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines from preimplantation genetic screening and diagnosis-analyzed embryos.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2010Article
- Biology and the systems view. Is there a move towards systems approaches in the life sciences?EMBO reports · 2009Article
- Polar body diagnosis - a step in the right direction?Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2008Article
- Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.Human reproduction updateReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the contribution of discordance among blastomeres from the same embryo in the interpretation of blastomeres biopsied from day 3 embryos.
methods228 IVF embryos had two blastomeres removed and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to detect aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y. Of the 228 embryos, 102 had complete FISH results for both blastomeres.
resultsWhen the 2 blastomeres of 102 embryos with successful FISH results were compared, 26 (25.5%) were concordant for all 8 chromosomes and 76 (74.5%) were discordant for one or more chromosomes. Among the 102 embryos, 12 (12%) were disomy in both blastomeres and 37 (36%) were disomic in all 8 chromosomes in one of the two blastomeres.
conclusionDiscordance among blastomeres from the same embryo appears to present a significant problem in interpreting results of embryos biopsied on day 3 and analyzed by FISH especially when most PGD's are done on single blastomeres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.