Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17216316›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2007

Immunopathology of Dirofilaria immitis infection.

F Simón, L H Kramer, A Román, W Blasini, R Morchón, C Marcos-Atxutegi, G Grandi, C Genchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. First reported case ofThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Severe ConcomitantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. TheFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Geographic Spatial Distribution Patterns ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current Situation of the Presence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

F SimónLaboratorio de Parasitología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. fersimon@usal.es
L H Kramer
A Román
W Blasini
R Morchón
C Marcos-Atxutegi
G Grandi
C Genchi
Universidad de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Parma · ITUniversity of Puerto Rico System · PRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heartworm disease caused by Dirofilaria immitis affects canine and feline hosts, with infections occasionally being reported in humans. Studies have shown that both dirofilarial antigens and those derived from its bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia, interact with the host organism during canine, feline and human infections and participate in the development of the pathology and in the regulation of the host's immune response. Both innate and acquired immune responses are observed and the development of the acquired response may depend on the host and, or on its parasitological status. This review aims at illustrating current research on the role of both D. immitis and Wolbachia, in the immunology and immunopathology of dirofilariosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsHumansImmunity, InnateTh1 CellsTh2 CellsWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID17216316
OpenAlexW2000569541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.