Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17215999›Full record

ArticleReviews in urology2006

The evolution of alpha-blockers for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Herbert Lepor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in urology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emerging and investigational drugs for premature ejaculation.Translational andrology and urology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Management of urinary incontinence.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Herbert LeporDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine New York, NY.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpha-blockers have been evaluated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for 30 years, from early trials with the nonselective alpha-inhibitor phenoxybenzamine to short-acting (prazosin) then long-acting (terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin) selective alpha(1)-antagonists. All of the alpha-blockers evaluated have demonstrated comparable effectiveness, and the evolution of alpha-blocker therapy for BPH has therefore focused primarily on improving convenience and tolerability. Although all of the long-acting alpha(1)-blockers are well tolerated, only tamsulosin and alfuzosin SR are administered without the requirement for dose titration. Alfuzosin has the additional advantage over tamsulosin of a lower incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction. Studies of subtype-selective alpha(1)-antagonists have not demonstrated superior efficacy or improved tolerability over the existing long-acting alpha(1)-blockers.

Identifiers

PMID17215999
PMCPMC1765042
OpenAlexW1481722157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.