Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17215658›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2007

Titration of HCTZ to 50 mg daily in individuals with stage 2 systolic hypertension pretreated with an angiotensin receptor blocker.

Joseph L Izzo, Joel M Neutel, Tonous Silfani, Robert Dubiel, Findlay Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Drug therapy for resistant hypertension: simplifying the approach.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2011
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph L IzzoDepartment of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA. jizzo@ams.ecmc.edu
Joel M Neutel
Tonous Silfani
Robert Dubiel
Findlay Walker
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USDaiichi Sankyo (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors studied the combination of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 50 mg/d plus olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg/d in stage 2 systolic hypertension during an extension phase of an open-label 12-week dose titration study. Subjects whose blood pressure remained above 120/80 mm Hg (n=105) on OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg/d subsequently received OM 40/HCTZ 50 mg/d for 4 weeks. Increasing HCTZ from 25 mg/d to 50 mg/d decreased systolic blood pressure by 3.6 mm Hg, increased BP control rates (<140/90 mm Hg) from 70.4% to 77.5%, and increased BP normalization rates (<120/80 mm Hg) from 15.4% to 27.8%. The combination was well tolerated. Compared with OM 40 mg/d monotherapy, neither dose of HCTZ affected serum potassium, but both increased serum glucose by about 5%. There was a dose-dependent increase in uric acid but no acute gout attacks. OM 40/HCTZ 50 mg/d is an effective strategy for managing stage 2 systolic hypertension.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBlood PressureDiureticsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionImidazolesOlmesartan MedoxomilTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersDiureticsHydrochlorothiazideImidazolesOlmesartan MedoxomilTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID17215658
PMCPMC8110172
OpenAlexW2063900137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.