Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17215274›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2006

Prospective, multi-centre clinic-based evaluation of four rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis.

D Mabey, R W Peeling, R Ballard, A S Benzaken, E Galbán, J Changalucha, D Everett, R Balira, D Fitzgerald, P Joseph and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Psoriasiform syphilis: A challenge.Dermatology reports · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Syphilis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of the impact of rapid syphilis tests on syphilis screening and treatment of pregnant women in Zambia.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

D MabeyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. david.mabey@lshtm.ac.uk
R W Peeling
R Ballard
A S Benzaken
E Galbán
J Changalucha
D Everett
R Balira
D Fitzgerald
P Joseph
S Nerette
J Li
H Zheng
Gheskio Centers · HTNational Institute for Medical Research · TZFundação Getulio Vargas · BRPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of London · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate prospectively four rapid, point-of-care serological tests for syphilis in prenatal or high risk populations in four countries.

methodsTests were performed on consecutive clinic attenders, using whole blood in the clinic, and whole blood and serum in the laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was evaluated, using a standard treponemal test (Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) or fluorescent treponemal antibody, absorbed (FTA-ABS) as gold standard. Non-treponemal tests (rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal diseases research laboratory (VDRL) tests) were also performed on all subjects at three sites.

resultsThe specificity of each rapid test was >95% at each site. Sensitivities varied from 64-100% and, in most cases, were lower when whole blood was used rather than serum.

conclusionsRapid serological tests for syphilis are an acceptable alternative to conventional laboratory tests. Since they do not require equipment or electricity, they could increase coverage of syphilis screening, and enable treatment to be given at the first clinic visit.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal DiagnosisProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisSyphilis Serodiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID17215274
PMCPMC2563907
OpenAlexW2129512403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.