Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17213498›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Impact on quality of life of a telemedicine system supporting head and neck cancer patients: a controlled trial during the postoperative period at home.

Jaap L van den Brink, Peter W Moorman, Maarten F de Boer, Wim C J Hop, Jean F A Pruyn, Carel D A Verwoerd, Jan H van Bemmel

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of psychological interventions for patients with head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Psychosocial interventions for patients with head and neck cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Development of a telehealth intervention for head and neck cancer patients.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2009
    Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaap L van den BrinkDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter W Moorman
Maarten F de Boer
Wim C J Hop
Jean F A Pruyn
Carel D A Verwoerd
Jan H van Bemmel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTelemedicine applications carry the potential to enhance the quality of life of patients, but studies evaluating telemedicine applications are still scarce. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine is limited and not yet conclusive. This study investigated whether telemedicine could be beneficial to the quality of life of cancer patients. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: Between 1999 and 2002, we conducted a prospective controlled trial evaluating the effects of a telemedicine application on the quality of life of patients with cancer involving the head and neck, using quality of life questionnaires that covered 22 quality of life parameters. All patients had undergone surgery for head and neck cancer at the Erasmus MC, a tertiary university hospital in The Netherlands. Patients in the intervention group were given access to an electronic health information support system for a period of six weeks, starting at discharge from the hospital.

resultsIn total, we included 145 patients in the control group and 39 in the intervention group. At 6 weeks, the end of the intervention, the intervention group had significantly improved QoL in 5 of the 22 studied parameters. Only one of these five quality of life parameters remained significantly different at 12 weeks.

conclusionsThis study adds to the sparse evidence that telemedicine may be beneficial for the quality of life of cancer patients.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputer LiteracyFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID17213498
PMCPMC2213461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.