ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2007
A retrospective, case-control pilot study of the natural history of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric patients with dyspepsia have chronic symptoms, anxiety, and lower quality of life as adolescents and adults.Gastroenterology · 2012Article
- Gestational age at birth and risk of gastric acid-related disorders in young adulthood.Annals of epidemiology · 2012Article
- Long-term proton pump inhibitor use in children: a retrospective review of safety.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2008Article
- Treatment options in pediatric GERD.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The duration of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an important factor in the development of esophageal complications. The objective of this study was to examine in a retrospective, case-controlled manner the prevalence of GERD in adults who were diagnosed with GERD in infancy or early childhood. Infants and children with nonsyndromic GERD diagnosed by an experienced pediatric gastroenterologist from 1976 to 1980 and control subjects seen for well-child care from 1980 to 1985 were included in this study. The subjects were located and contacted by telephone or mail and administered a brief structured questionnaire relating to their current history of GERD. GERD-A was defined as weekly heartburn or regurgitation of any severity, and GERD-B was defined as monthly heartburn or regurgitation greater than mild in severity. Sixty-five participants (31 patients and 34 controls) returned completed questionnaires and were subdivided into the three study groups as follows: Infant (15), Child (16), and Control (34). The prevalence of adulthood GERD-A was 13, 31, and 21% in the Infant, Child, and Control groups, respectively. Similarly, the prevalence of adulthood GERD-B was 20%, 44%, and 24%, respectively. The Child group tended to report more severe heartburn than the other groups. The Infant group tended to report more frequent regurgitation, and the Child group also reported a higher prevalence of nocturnal heartburn and more frequent use of GERD medications, although these were not statistically significant. These data suggest that pediatric GER is a heterogeneous disorder and that GERD occurring after infancy may be more predictive of the presence of GERD during adulthood. Longitudinal follow-up of a larger number of children is needed to answer the question of when classic adulthood GERD begins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.