Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17210077›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Update of the Anopheles gambiae PEST genome assembly.

Maria V Sharakhova, Martin P Hammond, Neil F Lobo, Jaroslaw Krzywinski, Maria F Unger, Maureen E Hillenmeyer, Robert V Bruggner, Ewan Birney, Frank H Collins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patterns of Gene Flow inEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria V SharakhovaCenter for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Notre Dame, Galvin Life Sciences Building, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0369, USA. msharakh@vt.edu
Martin P Hammond
Neil F Lobo
Jaroslaw Krzywinski
Maria F Unger
Maureen E Hillenmeyer
Robert V Bruggner
Ewan Birney
Frank H Collins
Center for Global Health · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversity of Notre Dame · USVirginia Tech · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

THE ANOPHELES GAMBIAE GENOME PROJECTU01AI048846 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI COLLINS, FRANK H. · 2001 to 2002
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200400039CNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI048846NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI 48846PHS HHS 266200400039C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genome of Anopheles gambiae, the major vector of malaria, was sequenced and assembled in 2002. This initial genome assembly and analysis made available to the scientific community was complicated by the presence of assembly issues, such as scaffolds with no chromosomal location, no sequence data for the Y chromosome, haplotype polymorphisms resulting in two different genome assemblies in limited regions and contaminating bacterial DNA.

resultsPolytene chromosome in situ hybridization with cDNA clones was used to place 15 unmapped scaffolds (sizes totaling 5.34 Mbp) in the pericentromeric regions of the chromosomes and oriented a further 9 scaffolds. Additional analysis by in situ hybridization of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones placed 1.32 Mbp (5 scaffolds) in the physical gaps between scaffolds on euchromatic parts of the chromosomes. The Y chromosome sequence information (0.18 Mbp) remains highly incomplete and fragmented among 55 short scaffolds. Analysis of BAC end sequences showed that 22 inter-scaffold gaps were spanned by BAC clones. Unmapped scaffolds were also aligned to the chromosome assemblies in silico, identifying regions totaling 8.18 Mbp (144 scaffolds) that are probably represented in the genome project by two alternative assemblies. An additional 3.53 Mbp of alternative assembly was identified within mapped scaffolds. Scaffolds comprising 1.97 Mbp (679 small scaffolds) were identified as probably derived from contaminating bacterial DNA. In total, about 33% of previously unmapped sequences were placed on the chromosomes.

conclusionThis study has used new approaches to improve the physical map and assembly of the A. gambiae genome.

Indexed as

Physical Chromosome MappingAnimalsAnophelesBacteriaCentromereChromosomesEuchromatinGenome, InsectPolymorphism, GeneticSpecies SpecificityEuchromatin

Identifiers

PMID17210077
PMCPMC1839121
OpenAlexW2171397799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.