Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17208958›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2007

Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening.

Mireille Faurobert, Christina Mihr, Nadia Bertin, Tomasz Pawlowski, Luc Negroni, Nicolas Sommerer, Mathilde Causse

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Peroxisomal Proteome Mining of Sweet Pepper (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mireille FaurobertInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, INRA, UR 1052, Domaine Saint-Maurice, 84143 Montfavet cedex, France. mireille.faurobert@avignon.inra.fr
Christina Mihr
Nadia Bertin
Tomasz Pawlowski
Luc Negroni
Nicolas Sommerer
Mathilde Causse
Polish Academy of Sciences · PLInstitut Agro Montpellier · FRPlantes et Système de Cultures Horticoles · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a model plant for studying fleshy fruit development. Several genetic and molecular approaches have been developed to increase our knowledge about the physiological basis of fruit growth, but very few data are yet available at the proteomic level. The main stages of fruit development were first determined through the dynamics of fruit diameter and pericarp cell number. Then, total proteins were extracted from pericarp tissue at six relevant developmental stages and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Protein patterns were markedly different between stages. Proteins showing major variations were monitored. We identified 90 of 1,791 well-resolved spots either by matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization time-of-flight peptide mass fingerprinting or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry sequencing and expressed sequence tag database searching. Clustered correlation analysis results pointed out groups of proteins with similar expression profiles during fruit development. In young fruit, spots linked to amino acid metabolism or protein synthesis were mainly expressed during the cell division stage and down-regulated later. Some spots linked to cell division processes could be identified. During the cell expansion phase, spots linked to photosynthesis and proteins linked to cell wall formation transiently increased. In contrast, the major part of the spots related to C compounds and carbohydrate metabolism or oxidative processes were up-regulated during fruit development, showing an increase in spot intensity during development and maximal abundance in mature fruit. This was also the case for spots linked to stress responses and fruit senescence. We discuss protein variations, taking into account their potential role during fruit growth and comparing our results with already known variations at mRNA and metabolite-profiling levels.

Indexed as

ProteomeChromatography, LiquidCluster AnalysisElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalExpressed Sequence TagsFruitPeptide MappingPlant ProteinsSolanum lycopersicumSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationUp-RegulationPlant ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID17208958
PMCPMC1820912
OpenAlexW2130611752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.