Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17206864›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2007

A high-resolution map of segmental DNA copy number variation in the mouse genome.

Timothy A Graubert, Patrick Cahan, Deepa Edwin, Rebecca R Selzer, Todd A Richmond, Peggy S Eis, William D Shannon, Xia Li, Howard L McLeod, James M Cheverud and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coding of pheromones by vomeronasal receptors.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bovine NK-lysin: Copy number variation and functional diversification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Timothy A GraubertDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stem Cell Biology Section, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America. graubert@medicine.wustl.edu
Patrick Cahan
Deepa Edwin
Rebecca R Selzer
Todd A Richmond
Peggy S Eis
William D Shannon
Xia Li
Howard L McLeod
James M Cheverud
Timothy J Ley

Funding

Specimen Acquistition and Expression ProfilingP01CA101937 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEY, TIMOTHY J. · 2003 to 2023
$58.8M
INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOMIC SCIENCET32HG000045 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL R BRENT, Barak A Cohen · 1997 to 2026
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA101937NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Submicroscopic (less than 2 Mb) segmental DNA copy number changes are a recently recognized source of genetic variability between individuals. The biological consequences of copy number variants (CNVs) are largely undefined. In some cases, CNVs that cause gene dosage effects have been implicated in phenotypic variation. CNVs have been detected in diverse species, including mice and humans. Published studies in mice have been limited by resolution and strain selection. We chose to study 21 well-characterized inbred mouse strains that are the focus of an international effort to measure, catalog, and disseminate phenotype data. We performed comparative genomic hybridization using long oligomer arrays to characterize CNVs in these strains. This technique increased the resolution of CNV detection by more than an order of magnitude over previous methodologies. The CNVs range in size from 21 to 2,002 kb. Clustering strains by CNV profile recapitulates aspects of the known ancestry of these strains. Most of the CNVs (77.5%) contain annotated genes, and many (47.5%) colocalize with previously mapped segmental duplications in the mouse genome. We demonstrate that this technique can identify copy number differences associated with known polymorphic traits. The phenotype of previously uncharacterized strains can be predicted based on their copy number at these loci. Annotation of CNVs in the mouse genome combined with sequence-based analysis provides an important resource that will help define the genetic basis of complex traits.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic VariationAnimalsChromosomes, MammalianCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticDNA ProbesGene DosageGenomeGerm CellsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID17206864
PMCPMC1761046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.