Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17206583›Full record

ArticleThe American naturalist2007

The loss of adaptive plasticity during long periods of environmental stasis.

Joanna Masel, Oliver D King, Heather Maughan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American naturalist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolutionary bioenergetics of sporulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reduced physiological plasticity in a fish adapted to stable temperatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Environment-to-phenotype mapping and adaptation strategies in varying environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Limited social plasticity in the socially polymorphic sweat beeBehavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2018
    Article
  12. Effects of mutation and selection on plasticity of a promoter activity inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Variability in fitness effects can preclude selection of the fittest.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Fate of a mutation in a fluctuating environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  19. Plasticity-mediated persistence in new and changing environments.International journal of evolutionary biology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna MaselDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. masel@u.arizona.edu
Oliver D King
Heather Maughan

Funding

Towards a general theory of evolutionary capacitanceR01GM076041 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MASEL, JOANNA · 2006 to 2009
$565k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076041NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive plasticity allows populations to adjust rapidly to environmental change. If this is useful only rarely, plasticity may undergo mutational degradation and be lost from a population. We consider a population of constant size N undergoing loss of plasticity at functional mutation rate m and with selective advantage s associated with loss. Environmental change events occur at rate theta per generation, killing all individuals that lack plasticity. The expected time until loss of plasticity in a fluctuating environment is always at least tau, the expected time until loss of plasticity in a static environment. When mN > 1 and N theta >> 1, we find that plasticity will be maintained for an average of at least 10(8) generations in a single population, provided tau > 18/theta. In a metapopulation, plasticity is retained under the more lenient condition tau > 1.3/theta, irrespective of mN, for a modest number of demes. We calculate both exact and approximate solutions for tau and find that it is linearly dependent only on the logarithm of N, and so, surprisingly, both the population size and the number of demes in the metapopulation make little difference to the retention of plasticity. Instead, tau is dominated by the term 1/(m+s/2).

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, BiologicalSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalExtinction, BiologicalMutationPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID17206583
PMCPMC1766558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.