Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17205320›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2007

Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement.

Jesse Dallery, Bethany R Raiff

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Dependence and withdrawal-induced craving predict abstinence in an incentive-based model of smoking relapse.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A fragile effect: The influence of episodic memory on delay discounting.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesse DalleryDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 112250, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. dallery@ufl.edu
Bethany R Raiff

Funding

Impulsivity and Treatments for Relapse Prevention in SmoR03DA015373 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DALLERY, JESSE · 2003 to 2004
$145k
NIDA NIH HHS R03DA015373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleHigher rates of delay discounting, or impulsive choice, may be related to relapse during abstinence reinforcement interventions for cigarette smoking, and a transdermal nicotine patch may attenuate delay discounting.

objectiveThe objectives of this study are to assess the relation between delay discounting and smoking after nicotine deprivation in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement and the effects of a transdermal nicotine patch on discounting and smoking. MATERIALS AND

methodsSmokers with no self-reported intention to quit were randomly assigned to an active (14 mg) or placebo patch group (n = 15 per group). In each of three sessions, after a 3-h deprivation period, participants completed a delay discounting task, mood, and craving measures and finally engaged in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement. Three abstinence reinforcement conditions were presented in counterbalanced order across the three sessions. During the control session, monetary consequences were delivered every 30 s regardless of smoking. During the low (5.00 dollars available) and high (20.00 dollars available) sessions, participants could earn a progressively increasing amount of money for each 30 s period of abstinence.

resultsThe low and high conditions significantly increased the latency to smoke relative to control and significantly decreased the amount of smoking. The nicotine patch decreased negative affect, but it did not significantly affect delay discounting or smoking. Individuals who smoked during the low and high conditions showed higher rates of discounting.

conclusionThe patch did not attenuate delay discounting or smoking after a period of deprivation, but contingencies for abstinence significantly decreased smoking. Higher rates of delay discounting were related to smoking in a model of abstinence reinforcement treatment.

Indexed as

Impulsive BehaviorNicotianaReinforcement, PsychologyAdministration, CutaneousAdultAffectChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSingle-Blind MethodNicotineNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.