ReviewDrugs1991
Calcium antagonists in patients with heart failure. A review.
Review in Drugs, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amlodipine in patients with angina uncontrolled by atenolol. A double blind placebo controlled cross over trial.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 1993Trial
- The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1996Review
- Nimodipine. Potential for drug-drug interactions in the elderly.Drugs & aging · 1995Review
- In vitro effect of r-verapamil on acute myelogenous leukemia blast cells: studies of cytokine secretion and cytokine-dependent blast proliferation.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 1995Article
- Pharmacotherapy of congestive heart failure. Currently used and experimental drugs.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 1994Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of calcium ions is essential to the normal function of the cardiovascular system. Drugs such as calcium antagonists can modulate the interaction between these ions and specific cells at different levels, interfering with myocardial contraction and relaxation, vascular tone, specific conduction tissues and neuromuscular function. Vascular beds play a crucial role in adjustment of myocardial function to different body oxygen requirements; compensatory mechanisms in congestive heart failure (CHF) involve the vascular system to a large extent and paradoxically may worsen myocardial performance. Vasodilating drugs represent an important step forward in achieving better symptomatic results in CHF patients, and may also increase their survival. Of the different classes of vasodilator drugs calcium antagonists may represent an attractive alternative due to their anti-ischaemic and antiarrhythmic effects. Despite the overall good response to the acute use of these drugs in CHF, long term studies in which first generation calcium antagonists (nifedipine, diltiazem, verapamil) were used have produced disappointing results. Their main drawbacks were negative inotropism, lack of preload reduction and activation of neurohormonal mechanisms with a subsequent adverse effect on cardiovascular function, the latter effect being the most significant. A few long term studies, of between 1 and 52 months, have not demonstrated a consistent improvement in functional class in spite of apparently good initial results. The second generation of calcium antagonists have more potent and selective vasodilating properties with less negative inotropic effects; these properties might justify their use in the therapy of CHF, but no clear recommendations can be given due to the lack of large, long-term, controlled studies. Overall, the existing clinical trials with calcium antagonists in CHF have not proved the superiority of this group of drugs when compared to other vasodilators. If the aetiology of CHF is related to the presence of coronary artery disease or arterial hypertension, calcium antagonists might be considered as additional therapeutic options. Diastolic dysfunction may be corrected or improved and coronary tone may be diminished, both of which may lead to a better myocardial oxygen supply. Systolic myocardial function must be evaluated in CHF patients before starting therapy with calcium antagonists in order to avoid possible deleterious effects. Further studies may shed more light on this matter and may indicate decisively whether or not calcium antagonists should play a role in the therapeutic pharmacological arsenal of selected CHF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.