Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17202174›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2007

MaizeGDB's new data types, resources and activities.

Carolyn J Lawrence, Mary L Schaeffer, Trent E Seigfried, Darwin A Campbell, Lisa C Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Sorghum QTL Atlas: a powerful tool for trait dissection, comparative genomics and crop improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Brassinosteroid control of sex determination in maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MaizeGDB: curation and outreach go hand-in-hand.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Choosing a genome browser for a Model Organism Database: surveying the maize community.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2010
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolyn J LawrenceUSDA-ARS Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Ames, IA 50011-3260, USA. triffid@iastate.edu
Mary L Schaeffer
Trent E Seigfried
Darwin A Campbell
Lisa C Harper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MaizeGDB is the Maize Genetics and Genomics Database. Available at MaizeGDB are diverse data that support maize research including maps, gene product information, loci and their various alleles, phenotypes (both naturally occurring and as a result of directed mutagenesis), stocks, sequences, molecular markers, references and contact information for maize researchers worldwide. Also available through MaizeGDB are various community support service bulletin boards including the Editorial Board's list of high-impact papers, information about the Annual Maize Genetics Conference and the Jobs board where employment opportunities are posted. Reported here are data updates, improvements to interfaces and changes to standard operating procedures that have been made during the past 2 years. MaizeGDB is freely available and can be accessed online at http://www.maizegdb.org.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticChromosome MappingGenomicsInternetUser-Computer InterfaceZea mays

Identifiers

PMID17202174
PMCPMC1899092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.