Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17201929›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Detection of weakly conserved ancestral mammalian regulatory sequences by primate comparisons.

Qian-fei Wang, Shyam Prabhakar, Sumita Chanan, Jan-Fang Cheng, Edward M Rubin, Dario Boffelli

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional primate genomics--leveraging the medical potential.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2012
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetics. It's the sequence, stupid!Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The monkey's perspective.Genome biology · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qian-fei WangGenomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. qwang2@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Shyam Prabhakar
Sumita Chanan
Jan-Fang Cheng
Edward M Rubin
Dario Boffelli
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USJoint Genome Institute · US

Funding

Comparative Genomic Resources for CV ResearchU01HL066681 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI RUBIN, EDWARD M · 2000 to 2007
$14.1M
STUDIES OF LIPOPROTEINS AND LIPID PROTEIN INTERACTIONST32HL007279 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI RUBIN, EDWARD M · 1985 to 2007
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007279NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL066681NHLBI NIH HHS U1HL66681BPHS HHS THL007279F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic comparisons between human and distant, non-primate mammals are commonly used to identify cis-regulatory elements based on constrained sequence evolution. However, these methods fail to detect functional elements that are too weakly conserved among mammals to distinguish them from non-functional DNA.

resultsTo evaluate a strategy for large scale genome annotation that is complementary to the commonly used distal species comparisons, we explored the potential of deep intra-primate sequence comparisons. We sequenced the orthologs of 558 kb of human genomic sequence, covering multiple loci involved in cholesterol homeostasis, in 6 non-human primates. Our analysis identified six non-coding DNA elements displaying significant conservation among primates but undetectable in more distant comparisons. In vitro and in vivo tests revealed that at least three of these six elements have regulatory function. Notably, the mouse orthologs of these three functional human sequences had regulatory activity despite their lack of significant sequence conservation, indicating that they are ancestral mammalian cis-regulatory elements. These regulatory elements could be detected even in a smaller set of three primate species including human, rhesus and marmoset.

conclusionWe have demonstrated that intra-primate sequence comparisons can be used to identify functional modules in large genomic regions, including cis-regulatory elements that are not detectable through comparison with non-mammalian genomes. With the available human and rhesus genomes and that of marmoset, which is being actively sequenced, this strategy can be extended to the whole genome in the near future.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBase SequenceDNA, IntergenicGenomeHaplorhiniMammalsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPrimatesRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificitySterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1DNA, IntergenicSterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID17201929
PMCPMC1839124
OpenAlexW275423871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.