ArticleGenome biology2007
Detection of weakly conserved ancestral mammalian regulatory sequences by primate comparisons.
Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and computational analysis of gene regulatory elements.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2015Review
- The common marmoset genome provides insight into primate biology and evolution.Nature genetics · 2014Article
- Human-specific CpG "beacons" identify loci associated with human-specific traits and disease.Epigenetics · 2012Article
- Functional primate genomics--leveraging the medical potential.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2012Review
- Evolution of nucleosome occupancy: conservation of global properties and divergence of gene-specific patterns.Molecular and cellular biology · 2011Article
- Characterization and potential functional significance of human-chimpanzee large INDEL variation.Mobile DNA · 2011Article
- Activation of Src and transformation by an RPTPα splice mutant found in human tumours.The EMBO journal · 2011Article
- Dating primate divergences through an integrated analysis of palaeontological and molecular data.Systematic biology · 2011Article
- Article
- Positive selection at high temperature reduces gene transcription in the bacteriophage ϕX174.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- A comprehensive analysis of gene expression evolution between humans and mice.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2009Article
- Genetics. It's the sequence, stupid!Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2008Article
- Linking fold, function and phylogeny: a comparative genomics view on protein (domain) evolution.Current genomics · 2008Article
- Assaying the regulatory potential of mammalian conserved non-coding sequences in human cells.Genome biology · 2008Article
- On the relation between promoter divergence and gene expression evolution.Molecular systems biology · 2008Article
- Multiple whole genome alignments and novel biomedical applications at the VISTA portal.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
- The monkey's perspective.Genome biology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic comparisons between human and distant, non-primate mammals are commonly used to identify cis-regulatory elements based on constrained sequence evolution. However, these methods fail to detect functional elements that are too weakly conserved among mammals to distinguish them from non-functional DNA.
resultsTo evaluate a strategy for large scale genome annotation that is complementary to the commonly used distal species comparisons, we explored the potential of deep intra-primate sequence comparisons. We sequenced the orthologs of 558 kb of human genomic sequence, covering multiple loci involved in cholesterol homeostasis, in 6 non-human primates. Our analysis identified six non-coding DNA elements displaying significant conservation among primates but undetectable in more distant comparisons. In vitro and in vivo tests revealed that at least three of these six elements have regulatory function. Notably, the mouse orthologs of these three functional human sequences had regulatory activity despite their lack of significant sequence conservation, indicating that they are ancestral mammalian cis-regulatory elements. These regulatory elements could be detected even in a smaller set of three primate species including human, rhesus and marmoset.
conclusionWe have demonstrated that intra-primate sequence comparisons can be used to identify functional modules in large genomic regions, including cis-regulatory elements that are not detectable through comparison with non-mammalian genomes. With the available human and rhesus genomes and that of marmoset, which is being actively sequenced, this strategy can be extended to the whole genome in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.