ArticleBMC structural biology2007
Sequence and structural features of carbohydrate binding in proteins and assessment of predictability using a neural network.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting protein-carbohydrate binding sites: a deep learning approach integrating protein language model embeddings and structural features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- PeSTo-Carbs: Geometric Deep Learning for Prediction of Protein-Carbohydrate Binding Interfaces.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Investigation of the anticoagulant activity of cyclic sulfated glycosaminoglycan mimetics.Carbohydrate research · 2023Article
- Structure-Based Neural Network Protein-Carbohydrate Interaction Predictions at the Residue Level.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Structure-based neural network protein-carbohydrate interaction predictions at the residue level.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- GlyNet: a multi-task neural network for predicting protein-glycan interactions.Chemical science · 2022Article
- SortPred: The first machine learning based predictor to identify bacterial sortases and their classes using sequence-derived information.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Rational identification and characterisation of peptide ligands for targeting polysialic acid.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Sulfated Non-Saccharide Glycosaminoglycan Mimetics as Novel Drug Discovery Platform for Various Pathologies.Current medicinal chemistry · 2020Review
- mACPpred: A Support Vector Machine-Based Meta-Predictor for Identification of Anticancer Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- CHARMM-GUI Glycan Modeler for modeling and simulation of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates.Glycobiology · 2019Article
- Integrating sequence and gene expression information predicts genome-wide DNA-binding proteins and suggests a cooperative mechanism.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Amino acid composition predicts prion activity.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Crystal structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin provides key insights into early steps of pore formation.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Dual modes of membrane binding direct pore formation by Streptolysin O.Molecular microbiology · 2015Article
- The effect of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on amyloid aggregation and toxicity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Structure- and context-based analysis of the GxGYxYP family reveals a new putative class of glycoside hydrolase.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Community-based network study of protein-carbohydrate interactions in plant lectins using glycan array data.PloS one · 2014Article
- Conserved-residue mutations in Wzy affect O-antigen polymerization and Wzz-mediated chain-length regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein-Carbohydrate interactions are crucial in many biological processes with implications to drug targeting and gene expression. Nature of protein-carbohydrate interactions may be studied at individual residue level by analyzing local sequence and structure environments in binding regions in comparison to non-binding regions, which provide an inherent control for such analyses. With an ultimate aim of predicting binding sites from sequence and structure, overall statistics of binding regions needs to be compiled. Sequence-based predictions of binding sites have been successfully applied to DNA-binding proteins in our earlier works. We aim to apply similar analysis to carbohydrate binding proteins. However, due to a relatively much smaller region of proteins taking part in such interactions, the methodology and results are significantly different. A comparison of protein-carbohydrate complexes has also been made with other protein-ligand complexes.
resultsWe have compiled statistics of amino acid compositions in binding versus non-binding regions- general as well as in each different secondary structure conformation. Binding propensities of each of the 20 residue types and their structure features such as solvent accessibility, packing density and secondary structure have been calculated to assess their predisposition to carbohydrate interactions. Finally, evolutionary profiles of amino acid sequences have been used to predict binding sites using a neural network. Another set of neural networks was trained using information from single sequences and the prediction performance from the evolutionary profiles and single sequences were compared. Best of the neural network based prediction could achieve an 87% sensitivity of prediction at 23% specificity for all carbohydrate-binding sites, using evolutionary information. Single sequences gave 68% sensitivity and 55% specificity for the same data set. Sensitivity and specificity for a limited galactose binding data set were obtained as 63% and 79% respectively for evolutionary information and 62% and 68% sensitivity and specificity for single sequences. Propensity and other sequence and structural features of carbohydrate binding sites have also been compared with our similar extensive studies on DNA-binding proteins and also with protein-ligand complexes.
conclusionCarbohydrates typically show a preference to bind aromatic residues and most prominently tryptophan. Higher exposed surface area of binding sites indicates a role of hydrophobic interactions. Neural networks give a moderate success of prediction, which is expected to improve when structures of more protein-carbohydrate complexes become available in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.