ArticleAtencion primaria2006
[New proposals for evaluating burnout. The specific evaluation of professional medical burnout].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- New Burnout Evaluation Model Based on the Brief Burnout Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties for Nursing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Pooled it
- The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in Reducing Anxiety Among Emergency Healthcare Professionals.Cureus · 2026Article
- Professional burnout among Spanish medical oncologists.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo introduce the development and validation of the Medical Professional Burnout Syndrome Scale belonging to the Questionnaire on Medical Professional Burnout (QMPB).
designDescriptive and transversal study in two stages. Stage 1: analysis of the psychometric properties of the new questionnaire dealing with its construction validity (exploratory factorial analysis, internal consistency, and confirmatory factorial analysis). Stage 11: study of its convergent validity with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). SETTING AND
participantsCommunity of Madrid, Spain. Stage I: 485 doctors (primary care centres and hospitals). Stage II: new sample of 100 doctors (primary care centres). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Professional burnout through the Medical Professional Burnout Syndrome Scale and the Maslach Burnout Inventory.
resultsThe exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis of the QMBP confirmed 3 factors that described medical professional burnout: Exhaustion, Distancing, and Loss of Hope, with an acceptable internal consistency. Convergent validity was confirmed with the MBI, especially in the Exhaustion dimension.
conclusionsEvaluation of psychometric properties confirmed the Medical Professional Burnout Syndrome Scale as a valid and specific instrument for studying burnout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.