Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17196358›Full record

Trial reportPatient education and counseling2007

The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.

Victoria Champion, Celette Sugg Skinner, Siu Hui, Patrick Monahan, Beth Juliar, Joanne Daggy, Usha Menon

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Tobacco Use Changes and Perceived Health Risks among Current Tobacco Users during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Breast Cancer Survivorship Experiences of Urban Hispanic Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria ChampionIndiana University, School of Nursing, 1111 Middle Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. vchampio@iupui.edu
Celette Sugg Skinner
Siu Hui
Patrick Monahan
Beth Juliar
Joanne Daggy
Usha Menon

Funding

Promoting Breast Cancer Screening Via Computer V PhoneR01NR008434 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
COMPARISON OF TAILORED MAMMOGRAPHY INTERVENTIONSR01NR004081 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA L · 1996 to 1999
–
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008434NINR NIH HHS R01 NR04081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this intervention was to increase mammography adherence in women who had not had a mammogram in the last 15 months.

methodsA prospective randomized intervention trial used four groups: (1) usual care, (2) tailored telephone counseling, (3) tailored print, (4) tailored telephone counseling and print. Participants included a total of 1244 women from two sites-a general medicine clinic setting serving predominately low-income clientele and a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). Computer-tailored interventions addressed each woman's perceived risk of breast cancer, benefits and/or barriers and self-efficacy related to mammography screening comparing delivery by telephone and mail.

resultsCompared to usual care all intervention groups increased mammography adherence significantly (odds ratio 1.60-1.91) when the entire sample was included.

conclusionsAll interventions groups demonstrated efficacy in increasing mammography adherence as compared to a usual care group. When the intervention analysis considered baseline stage, pre contemplators (women who did not intend to get a mammogram) did not significantly increase in mammography adherence as compared to usual care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Women who are in pre contemplation stage may need a more intensive intervention.

Indexed as

TelephoneComputer-Assisted InstructionCounselingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansIndianaLogistic ModelsMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMissouriNursing Evaluation ResearchPamphletsPatient Care Planning

Identifiers

PMID17196358
PMCPMC1858664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.