Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17196042›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

A high-resolution map of synteny disruptions in gibbon and human genomes.

Lucia Carbone, Gery M Vessere, Boudewijn F H ten Hallers, Baoli Zhu, Kazutoyo Osoegawa, Alan Mootnick, Andrea Kofler, Johannes Wienberg, Jane Rogers, Sean Humphray and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Co-option of the lineage-specificProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lucia CarboneBACPAC Resources, Children's Hospital of Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California, United States of America. lcarbone@chori.org
Gery M Vessere
Boudewijn F H ten Hallers
Baoli Zhu
Kazutoyo Osoegawa
Alan Mootnick
Andrea Kofler
Johannes Wienberg
Jane Rogers
Sean Humphray
Carol Scott
R Alan Harris
Aleksandar Milosavljevic
Pieter J de Jong

Funding

BAC Library Production for Comparative GeneticsU01HG002523 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL &RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI DE JONG, PIETER J. · 2002 to 2008
$7.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02523-02NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG002523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gibbons are part of the same superfamily (Hominoidea) as humans and great apes, but their karyotype has diverged faster from the common hominoid ancestor. At least 24 major chromosome rearrangements are required to convert the presumed ancestral karyotype of gibbons into that of the hominoid ancestor. Up to 28 additional rearrangements distinguish the various living species from the common gibbon ancestor. Using the northern white-cheeked gibbon (2n = 52) (Nomascus leucogenys leucogenys) as a model, we created a high-resolution map of the homologous regions between the gibbon and human. The positions of 100 synteny breakpoints relative to the assembled human genome were determined at a resolution of about 200 kb. Interestingly, 46% of the gibbon-human synteny breakpoints occur in regions that correspond to segmental duplications in the human lineage, indicating a common source of plasticity leading to a different outcome in the two species. Additionally, the full sequences of 11 gibbon BACs spanning evolutionary breakpoints reveal either segmental duplications or interspersed repeats at the exact breakpoint locations. No specific sequence element appears to be common among independent rearrangements. We speculate that the extraordinarily high level of rearrangements seen in gibbons may be due to factors that increase the incidence of chromosome breakage or fixation of the derivative chromosomes in a homozygous state.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome, HumanAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialHumansHylobatesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17196042
PMCPMC1756914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.