ReviewHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2006
Analysing structural and cultural change in acute settings using a Giddens-Weick paradigmatic approach.
Review in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse leader agency: Creating an environment conducive to support for graduate nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2022Article
- A focused ethnography in the context of a European cancer research hospital accreditation program.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: a laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment.BMJ open · 2016Article
- The development, design, testing, refinement, simulation and application of an evaluation framework for communities of practice and social-professional networks.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- An empirical assessment of social structural and cultural change in clinical directorates.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An examination of the salient literature on hospital clinical directorates (CDs) is presented. A critique of the largely managerialist, instrumental, hortatory and normative extant literature about CDs is offered. In analysing the literature this way the earlier promotional and critical literature is eschewed in favour of an evaluative approach. CDs are then reconceptualised by locating them within two overarching accounts of social structure--formalised, prescribed frameworks, and enacted, patterned interactions--following the kinds of distinctions made by Giddens, Weick, social action and institutional theorists. Social structure as it relates to culture is also considered, following Martin. Such an approach facilitates an understanding of the general weaknesses of health service perspectives and methods of analysis, and exposes the strengths of Giddens-Weick type paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17195577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.