Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17195074›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2007

PET imaging with [18F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine for prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer.

Hinrich A Wieder, Hans Geinitz, Robert Rosenberg, Florian Lordick, Karen Becker, Alexander Stahl, Ernst Rummeny, Jörg R Siewert, Markus Schwaiger, Jens Stollfuss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Imaging of proliferation with 18F-FLT PET/CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small-cell lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2010
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. EJNMMI research · 2019
    Article
  9. Response Monitoring with [Molecular imaging and biology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of tumor response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using (18)F-FLT: a meta-analysis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2014
    Article
  19. FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hinrich A WiederDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany. h@wieder.de
Hans Geinitz
Robert Rosenberg
Florian Lordick
Karen Becker
Alexander Stahl
Ernst Rummeny
Jörg R Siewert
Markus Schwaiger
Jens Stollfuss
Technical University of Munich · DEMunich University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePositron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-labelled 3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine (FLT) was assessed for therapy monitoring in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

methodsTen patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included and underwent long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy (total dose 45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/day, concomitant 250 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil) followed by surgery. FLT-PET was performed prior to chemoradiotherapy, 2 weeks after initiation of chemoradiotherapy and preoperatively (3-4 weeks post chemoradiotherapy). FLT uptake was correlated with histopathological tumour regression and changes in T stage.

resultsMean tumour FLT uptake was 4.2+/-1.0 SUV before therapy and decreased significantly to 2.9+/-0.6 SUV 14 days after initiation of chemoradiotherapy (-28.6%+/-10.7%, p=0.005). The preoperative scan showed a further decrease to 1.9+/-0.4 SUV (-54.7%+/-7.6%, p=0.005). However, the degree of change in FLT uptake 2 weeks after initiation and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy did not correlate with histopathological tumour regression.

conclusionFLT-PET did not seem to be a promising method for assessment of tumour response in the studied chemoradiotherapy regimen in patients with rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCell ProliferationDideoxynucleosidesFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRectal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomealovudineDideoxynucleosidesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID17195074
OpenAlexW1998723586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.