Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17194824›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

Oral versus intravenous flucytosine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated cryptococcal meningitis.

Annemarie E Brouwer, Hendrikus J M van Kan, Elizabeth Johnson, Adul Rajanuwong, Prapit Teparrukkul, Vannaporn Wuthiekanun, Wirongrong Chierakul, Nick Day, Thomas S Harrison

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Drug Resistance and Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Invasive Candidiasis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Pre-Existing Liver Disease and Toxicity of Antifungals.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Neural Stem Cell-Based Anticancer Gene Therapy: A First-in-Human Study in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Annemarie E BrouwerCentre of Infection, St George's University of London, London SW17 ORE, United Kingdom.
Hendrikus J M van Kan
Elizabeth Johnson
Adul Rajanuwong
Prapit Teparrukkul
Vannaporn Wuthiekanun
Wirongrong Chierakul
Nick Day
Thomas S Harrison
Mahidol University · THSappasithiprasong Hospital · THSt George's, University of London · GBAcademic Medical Center · NLMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · TH

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a randomized controlled trial of amphotericin B-based therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated cryptococcal meningitis in Thailand, we also compared the mycological efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral versus intravenous flucytosine at 100 mg/kg of body weight/day for the initial 2 weeks. Half of 32 patients assigned to the two arms containing flucytosine were randomized to oral and half to intravenous flucytosine. Early fungicidal activity was determined from serial quantitative cultures of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and toxicity was assessed by clinical and laboratory monitoring. Flucytosine and fluorouracil concentrations in plasma and CSF were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. No significant bone marrow or hepatotoxicity was seen, there was no detectable difference in bone marrow toxicity between patients on intravenous and those on oral formulation, and no patients discontinued treatment. In patients receiving intravenous flucytosine, the median 24-h area under the concentration-time curve was significantly higher than in the oral group. Despite this difference, there was no difference in early fungicidal activity between patients on intravenous compared with patients on oral flucytosine. The results suggest that either formulation can be used safely at this dosage in a developing country setting, without drug concentration monitoring. The bioavailability of the oral formulation may be reduced in late-stage HIV-infected patients in Thailand. Concentrations of flucytosine with intravenous formulation at 100 mg/kg/day may be in excess of those required for maximal fungicidal activity.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveFemaleFlucytosineHemoglobinsHIV InfectionsHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleMeningitis, CryptococcalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsFlucytosineHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID17194824
PMCPMC1803146
OpenAlexW2146391063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.