Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17194776›Full record

ArticleGenetics2007

Drosophila ATR in double-strand break repair.

Jeannine R LaRocque, Burnley Jaklevic, Tin Tin Su, Jeff Sekelsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mutation and apoptosis are well-coordinated for protecting against DNA damage-inducing toxicity in Drosophila.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ATR prevents CaFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Drosophila Can Teach Us About Radiation Biology of Human Cancers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Loss ofGenetics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannine R LaRocqueDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Burnley Jaklevic
Tin Tin Su
Jeff Sekelsky
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cell Cycle Regulation by Checkpoints in DrosophilaR01GM066441 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2002 to 2006
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM66441NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of a cell to sense and respond to DNA damage is essential for genome stability. An important aspect of the response is arrest of the cell cycle, presumably to allow time for repair. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATR are essential for such cell-cycle control, but some observations suggest that they also play a direct role in DNA repair. The Drosophila ortholog of ATR, MEI-41, mediates the DNA damage-dependent G2-M checkpoint. We examined the role of MEI-41 in repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by P-element excision. We found that mei-41 mutants are defective in completing the later steps of homologous recombination repair, but have no defects in end-joining repair. We hypothesized that these repair defects are the result of loss of checkpoint control. To test this, we genetically reduced mitotic cyclin levels and also examined repair in grp (DmChk1) and lok (DmChk2) mutants. Our results suggest that a significant component of the repair defects is due to loss of MEI-41-dependent cell cycle regulation. However, this does not account for all of the defects we observed. We propose a novel role for MEI-41 in DSB repair, independent of the Chk1/Chk2-mediated checkpoint response.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2DNA RepairDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenes, cdcModels, GeneticMutationNuclear ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNACell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2Drosophila Proteinsgrp protein, Drosophilalok protein, DrosophilaMei-41 protein, DrosophilaNuclear ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPSI protein, DrosophilaRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17194776
PMCPMC1840096
OpenAlexW2079473465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.