Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17194448›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2007

Detection of pre-neoplastic and neoplastic prostate disease by MALDI profiling of urine.

Amosy E M'Koma, David L Blum, Jeremy L Norris, Tatsuki Koyama, Dean Billheimer, Saundra Motley, Mayshan Ghiassi, Nika Ferdowsi, Indrani Bhowmick, Sam S Chang and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The present and future of prostate cancer urine biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amosy E M'KomaDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
David L Blum
Jeremy L Norris
Tatsuki Koyama
Dean Billheimer
Saundra Motley
Mayshan Ghiassi
Nika Ferdowsi
Indrani Bhowmick
Sam S Chang
Jay H Fowke
Richard M Caprioli
Neil A Bhowmick
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jin Chen · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Inst.Research and Academic Career Development AwardK12GM068543 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHALKLEY, G. ROGER · 2003 to 2009
$1.6M
Adipose-Related Biomarkers of Prostate CancerR21CA098348 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FOWKE, JAY H · 2003 to 2004
$298k
NCI NIH HHS CA68485NCI NIH HHS CA98348NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS R21 CA098348NIGMS NIH HHS 5K12GM068543NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM068543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heterogeneous progression to the development of prostate cancer (PCa) has precluded effective early detection screens. Existing prostate cancer screening paradigms have relatively poor specificity for cancer relative to other prostate diseases, commonly benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A method for discrimination of BPH, HGPIN, and PCa urine proteome was developed through testing 407 patient samples using matrix assisted laser desorption-mass spectrometry time of flight (MALDI-TOF). Urine samples were adsorbed to reverse phase resin, washed, and the eluant spotted directly for MALDI-TOF analysis of peptides. The processing resolved over 130 verifiable signals of a mass range of 1000-5000 m/z to suggest 71.2% specificity and 67.4% sensitivity in discriminating PCa vs. BPH. Comparing BPH and HGPIN resulted in 73.6% specificity and 69.2% sensitivity. Comparing PCa and HGPIN resulted in 80.8% specificity and 81.0% sensitivity. The high throughput, low-cost assay method developed is amenable for large patient numbers required for supporting biomarker identification.

Indexed as

AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesPrecancerous ConditionsProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic Intraepithelial NeoplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsProteomicsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationPeptides

Identifiers

PMID17194448
PMCPMC2562600
OpenAlexW2040969703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.