Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17192395›Full record

Trial reportBlood2007

Comparative gene expression profiling of in vitro differentiated megakaryocytes and erythroblasts identifies novel activatory and inhibitory platelet membrane proteins.

Iain C Macaulay, Marloes R Tijssen, Daphne C Thijssen-Timmer, Arief Gusnanto, Michael Steward, Philippa Burns, Cordelia F Langford, Peter D Ellis, Frank Dudbridge, Jaap-Jan Zwaginga and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Platelets fine-tune effector responses of naïve CD4Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Iain C MacaulayDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marloes R Tijssen
Daphne C Thijssen-Timmer
Arief Gusnanto
Michael Steward
Philippa Burns
Cordelia F Langford
Peter D Ellis
Frank Dudbridge
Jaap-Jan Zwaginga
Nicholas A Watkins
C Ellen van der Schoot
Willem H Ouwehand
University of Cambridge · GBSanquin · NLWellcome Sanger Institute · GBLeiden University · NLMedical Research Council · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105260799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify previously unknown platelet receptors we compared the transcriptomes of in vitro differentiated megakaryocytes (MKs) and erythroblasts (EBs). RNA was obtained from purified, biologically paired MK and EB cultures and compared using cDNA microarrays. Bioinformatical analysis of MK-up-regulated genes identified 151 transcripts encoding transmembrane domain-containing proteins. Although many of these were known platelet genes, a number of previously unidentified or poorly characterized transcripts were also detected. Many of these transcripts, including G6b, G6f, LRRC32, LAT2, and the G protein-coupled receptor SUCNR1, encode proteins with structural features or functions that suggest they may be involved in the modulation of platelet function. Immunoblotting on platelets confirmed the presence of the encoded proteins, and flow cytometric analysis confirmed the expression of G6b, G6f, and LRRC32 on the surface of platelets. Through comparative analysis of expression in platelets and other blood cells we demonstrated that G6b, G6f, and LRRC32 are restricted to the platelet lineage, whereas LAT2 and SUCNR1 were also detected in other blood cells. The identification of the succinate receptor SUCNR1 in platelets is of particular interest, because physiologically relevant concentrations of succinate were shown to potentiate the effect of low doses of a variety of platelet agonists.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationErythroblastsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMegakaryocytesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlatelet Membrane GlycoproteinsPlatelet Membrane Glycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID17192395
PMCPMC6485507
OpenAlexW2063691024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.