Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17192115›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2007

Reducing the societal burden of depression: a review of economic costs, quality of care and effects of treatment.

Julie M Donohue, Harold Alan Pincus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Evaluating Commercially Available Mobile Apps for Depression Self-Management.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Personalized (N-of-1) Trials for Depression: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Alternating current cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Neural Correlates of Reward Processing in Depressed and Healthy Preschool-Age Children.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2016
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. jdonohue@pitt.edu
Harold Alan Pincus
Columbia University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING COREP60MD000207 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI THOMAS, STEPHEN B. · 2002 to 2011
$10.8M
MHCRC FOR THE STUDY OF LATE LIFE MOOD DISORDERSP30MH052247 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REYNOLDS, CHARLES F · 1995 to 2004
$7.5M
Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Programs (RMI)K12RR023267 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPOOR, WISHWA N · 2005 to 2006
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS K12RR023267NIMHD NIH HHS MD00207NIMH NIH HHS MH052247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a highly prevalent condition that results in substantial functional impairment. Advocates have attempted in recent years to make the 'business case' for investing in quality improvement efforts in depression care, particularly in primary care settings. The business case suggests that the costs of depression treatment may be offset by gains in worker productivity and/or reductions in other healthcare spending. In this paper, we review the evidence in support of this argument for improving the quality of depression treatment. We examined the impact of depression on two of the primary drivers of the societal burden of depression: healthcare utilisation and worker productivity. Depression leads to higher healthcare utilisation and spending, most of which is not the result of depression treatment costs. Depression is also a leading cause of absenteeism and reduced productivity at work. It is clear that the economic burden of depression is substantial; however, critical gaps in the literature remain and need to be addressed. For instance, we do not know the economic burden of untreated and/or inappropriately treated versus appropriately treated depression. There remain considerable problems with access to and quality of depression treatment. Progress has been made in terms of access to care, but quality of care is seldom consistent with national treatment guidelines. A wide range of effective treatments and care programmes for depression are available, yet rigorously tested clinical models to improve depression care have not been widely adopted by healthcare systems. Barriers to improving depression care exist at the patient, healthcare provider, practice, plan and purchaser levels, and may be both economic and non-economic. Studies evaluating interventions to improve the quality of depression treatment have found that the cost per QALY associated with improved depression care ranges from a low of 2519 US dollars to a high of 49,500 US dollars. We conclude from our review of the literature that effective treatment of depression is cost effective, but that evidence of a medical or productivity cost offset for depression treatment remains equivocal, and this points to the need for further research in this area.

Indexed as

DepressionQuality of Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumansPersons with Disabilities

Identifiers

PMID17192115
OpenAlexW1537847405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.